this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2023
1628 points (98.8% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35601 readers
1328 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 125 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Well, that guy is clearly a massive prick, but let's also talk about how fucking ugly that truck is. I don't know when everyone decided that land yacht pickup trucks were the bees knees, but they're not. They're just dumb and so. goddamn. ugly.

[–] Silvus 73 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You mean their Emotiional Support Truck.

[–] TheBat 2 points 1 year ago

Pavement princess

[–] FReddit 37 points 1 year ago

Also partly responsible for an increase in pedestrian fatalities.

[–] Zink 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There is a lot of anger, frustration, and unacknowledged insecurity going into vehicle purchases in the US.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I agree. The amount of unrequited hate is disturbing.

[–] TheBat -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is a lot of anger, frustration, and unacknowledged insecurity going in the US.

FTFY

[–] Zink 9 points 1 year ago

No argument here. The wasteful and dangerous vehicles are just a minor symptom of our cultural issues.

[–] Fubar91 19 points 1 year ago (6 children)

For real dude, there's no decent sized mid sized pickups anymore. I drove my '99 dodge Dakota forever and loved the size! It even had a V8 compared to most of the newer land yachts with 4 bangers and v6s.

I don't need a block on wheels, I just need a smaller pickup because I camp and haul shit enough to justify needing one vs a car or suv.

[–] Fosheze 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So, I don't know if it's still an issue but I know the whole land yacht thing started because of emissions standards. The US used to (they might still) set emissions standards based on wheel base rather than vehicle type. The larger the wheel base the looser the emissions standards. The thought was that vehicles that needed a larger wheelbase like large work trucks would always have higher emissions so they wanted to take that into account. But what actually happened is manufacturers just started making larger and larger vehicles to take advantage of the more lax emissions standards.

I think the wheelbase based emissions standards thing has been fixed now, but I don't know where I heard that so it might even still be a thing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

If you look at actual comparable bed length and cab type, you realise that outside of height, truck dimensions haven't increased that much (especially not compared to car sizes, ex.: the mk6 Jetta is the size of the Passat from 10 years prior).

[–] Cabrio 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Buy an Aussie import ute. They're exactly what you want and not common in the US so you have a fashion statement.

[–] Lev_Astov 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Last I'd checked, it was virtually impossible to import non-DOT-approved cars to the US. You basically had to take them apart and then assemble them here as "kit cars" to get around stupid grey market rules.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can either bring in a 25 year old one, or rebody a local Chevy SS or Pontiac G8 with a ute shell.

[–] Lev_Astov 1 points 1 year ago

I know; it's so easy it's a wonder we don't see more of them!

[–] Fubar91 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Haha never seen these things before. Reminds me of an El Camino, but trying to be a sports car instead of America muscle upfront.

[–] Cabrio 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Got it in one, they're an Australian icon. It's like the reverse mullet of cars, party in the front, business in the back.

[–] cookiecollision 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I had a '93 F150 for a few years. It was a v8 5.8L with an extended bed. Until... I let my friend borrow it and he... redlined it for several miles in first gear, (accidentally put it in 1st gear instead of into drive, and didn't noticed the extremely loud engine and the fact that he couldn't go over 20mph... yes, he is that stupid lmao) until it began smoking and he pulled it into a random driveway. And then as if that weren't bad enough, the genius homeowner popped the hood and hosed down the engine which, if you know anything about cars or metal, was the dumbest thing he could've done. Cracked up the whole thing. 😭

But that thing was a fucking beast man. These new trucks can't even fit a fucking 2x4 or a sheet of OSB in the bed. They are useless.

[–] gravityslave 3 points 1 year ago

That's why I got the Honda Ridgeline. It is basically a Honda Pilot with a bed. Small by truck standards but is great for someone that just needs to haul stuff in the suburbs and will never take it off-road. I don't get all the people around here that think they need a lifted full sized truck to drive to work on city streets everyday.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I drove an '04 Dakota for years (last year of that body style before they started making them bigger). Loved that truck, perfect size for camping or hauling band equipment.

Sucks that the mid-sized trucks now are bigger that the full-sized trucks from back then.

[–] Tygr -4 points 1 year ago

Safety regulations has a lot to do with it too. They have to squeeze in airbags and all the safety tech which would leave no room to sit in that older Dakota.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Just check the bed. If there’s a liner, chances are the truck is needed. If it’s clean, it’s a vanity truck.

I own a 350 and am very aware of just how big this truck is. But I do need the pulling power for work related things. I’ve also used it to help people that have broken down.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I haven't seen a new truck without a bed liner in decades. I apparently thought they were standard equipment.

If you need one, you need one, but I'm confident that a tiny percentage of these things are used for actual work. Also: still ugly. Sorry.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, not standard. And I guess if they’re that common where you are then check the wear of the liner. Like another commenter said, they get fucked up pretty quickly. It’s easy to tell if a truck is vanity or not just by looking at the bed. I’ve called people out for driving them. It’s especially humiliating for the guys because I’m a woman.

I also appreciate that you’re confident in your assessment without actually talking to any of those people. Assuming just makes an ass out of u and me.

[–] Halosheep 8 points 1 year ago

As someone who lives in Texas and every other vehicle in the road is an oversized pickup, fuck em.

They drive worse faster the douchy chargers/mustangs and somehow manage to use their blinker less often than a BMW driver.

[–] Buelldozer -2 points 1 year ago

I haven't seen a new truck without a bed liner in decades.

Plenty of 'em out there homie. I bought a used DMax in 2019 and despite being a Denali edition it didn't come with a bedliner, just a rubber mat for the floor. I should have had one sprayed in when I got the truck because my box is now beat to shit.

I think all the previous owner did with it was tow a horse trailer.

[–] The_v 7 points 1 year ago

I drive 3/4 or one ton trucks for work. They suck to drive. You feel every bump, they sway on corners or with wind, and parking is a nightmare. I have no idea why somebody would drive them around for vanity.

I piss off my teenage son all the time using the outlander sport I bought for him. For driving around town it's awesome.

[–] Screwthehole 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah that sounds about right. My liner is already marked up and I've had it since March lol. I haul large items almost daily for work.

[–] Eheran 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So you have it from work and also use it privately?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, they own the truck for work.

[–] Screwthehole 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Right. Not wealthy enough to have separate vehicles for personal and work

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

At least you get to write the cost of your vehicle off on your taxes, unlike everyone else.

[–] Buelldozer -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

My DMax is a pretty truck but the beat to crap box, without bedliner, is under a tonneau cover so you can't see it. Another thing you can do is check the receiver hitch, if it's scratched / rusty inside then you know its being used to tow something. 🙂

[–] galloog1 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That would be the US EPA and whomever influenced them in the Carter administration to classify trucks as regulated differently than other passenger vehicles. It unironically financially encourages SUVs over vans and bigger bodied trucks over smaller ones.

It's killed the work truck, the small truck, and literal pedestrians.

Their intentions were fine at the time and it has resulted in average miles per gallon within their class going way up but it needs to be amended. The shifting of sales eats into any fuel efficiency gains. Regulate them the same as any passenger vehicle and give me my utility back.

[–] LukeMedia 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I wish small pickups were still a thing

[–] Lordran_Hollow 3 points 1 year ago

The Maverick is (comparatively) a small modern pickup. It's the whole reason I chose it. I always wanted a truck, but I absolutely detested how big and inefficient they were, so I never bothered. I had a Maverick come in for a remote start last year and got to look at it and I quite liked it, ended up ordering one of my own that same year.

[–] Screwthehole 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ford had new rangers on the lot when I was shopping for my truck

[–] LukeMedia 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

New rangers aren't that small. I really like the size of old rangers, colarados, Toyota Tacomas. Those were reasonably sized trucks meant for utility. Not for dick swinging contests and skirting EPA regulations.

[–] Screwthehole 1 points 1 year ago

I found it very small. Smaller than my mid size SUV I was replacing and I couldn't even get in the driver seat. But obviously ymmv