this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2025
33 points (92.3% liked)
science
16815 readers
174 users here now
A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.
rule #1: be kind
<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.
2024-11-11
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
There is a book called "Doctored" that argues that a lot of the foundational research on Alzheimer's and amyloid plaques was faked. Excerpt:
https://www.sciencefriday.com/articles/doctored-book-excerpt/
Separately, there is supposedly some evidence now that Alzheimer's is caused by a virus, or by a history of viral infections.
You got a citation for that?
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=alzheimer%27s+virus
I'm not the poster you're contempting, I'm just some asshole Empiricist who works to consistently check before contempting.
Scientific-integrity is not in the culture I grew-up in ( dad's medical-culture Scientism has no tolerance for it, neither did mom's Catholicism ),
but it is required for outright intellectual-integrity.
For those who won't check the link to see the results, here is the abstract from 1 paper:
bold-highlighting is by me.
Scary that asking for a citation is considered contempting by some. That doesn't back up what the other person said at all though. There's a huge difference between saying a virus causes AD and saying that infections worsen cognitive decline in AD. I understand not everyone is experienced in reading scientific literature, but it's important to recognize that and not spread misinformation if you don't understand what is being described. The closest this paper gets is to connecting two things: infections cause inflammation and inflammation contributes to AD. Both of these things have already been known for a long time. This does not mean AD is a result of a virus or viral infections.