this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2025
581 points (98.8% liked)

politics

20427 readers
6179 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Focus on millionaires. Not just musk

[–] zergtoshi 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Focus on all billionaires. Not just Musk.
FTFY

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (3 children)
[–] zergtoshi 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I'm trying to stay more realistic.
Anyone at shy above 1 million USD living in the US is having a live that's closer to the average person than it is to a billionaire let alone Musk.

[–] Coreidan 2 points 2 hours ago

Yep and for those who have a million dollars most of those people have that money locked away in a retirement fund that they plan on using to retire off at 65/70 instead of buying yachts. That isn’t a lot of money to retire off of. It will buy you a pretty minimalist lifestyle bearing all healthcare considerations

[–] CharlesDarwin 2 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Apparently, it's about 18% of households.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 hours ago

And much of that is the value of the home they live in and pension funds.

I'd wager most millionaires don't even know they're millionaires.

[–] zergtoshi 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

And that's why it's harder to get support for such an approach, while support for taxing billionaires should be available in abundance.

[–] CharlesDarwin 2 points 4 hours ago

Yes. I like what I think is Bernie's idea. The sentiment is basically do everything possible to tax all income and assets over one billion. Tell those crying for billionaires to shut up because surely people can live on assets of $999,999,999.00.

Maybe readjust for inflation every decade or so. Even if it got negotiated down to something like a cap of 5 billion or 10 billion, this would still be good for America. Someone with assets like Elon, and Bezos and Zuck, etc. should not even exist, even if most of those assets are supposedly "only" on paper. Surely, though, being someone with just under a billion or just under 5 or just under 10 should provide enough "motivation" for all the future supposed "job-creators" that we always hear so much about.

Surely, having 999 million is better than whatever they started with and we should all acknowledge they didn't make all that themselves. They have a huge working government (or they did at one point, we'll see what we are left with after Bronzo the Clown is done) that helped them, along with many, many workers making that money. They should show GRATITUDE for that by helping to further sustain that system, not just leech from it and be able to buy politicians that actively work to make it worse for those not in the billionaire class.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Million? That's like 2 houses or a small truckload of eggs.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Are you joking? If you own 2 houses or are buying truckloads of eggs, we definitely need to redistribute your wealth.

And probably criminal charges too

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

no no, two houses OR a truckload of eggs, I don't have either, I'm just sayin a million don't go as far as it used to.