this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
68 points (91.5% liked)

Canada

7971 readers
1700 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Alright, I see the disconnect here. You're talking about rural bike lanes as well as park paths. I'm talking about city bike lanes where you have about 12 meters to work with before you're up against buildings on both sides half the time.

In that context, there's only so much you can do to widen lanes, and usually that's only possible by removing lanes for other modes of transit.

Frankly speaking, bike lanes of other areas have to go based on different standards as they exist for different purposes, so I've been isolating entirely to typical city streets.

Most of the sidewalks plus bike lanes in Toronto at least tend to only add up to about five meters in width at most, with plenty being only three meters wide together (two for the sidewalk, and one for the bike lane), with streets being between one or two lanes for the most part, excluding certain major streets.

In this context, it's crazy to think about bikes and wheelchairs sharing space together. And to be frank, even if the space was double that, I think the difference in typical speed makes such considerations still crazy. Just because some mobility scooters and electric wheelchairs are physically able to go as fast as a slow bike, doesn't mean that it's safe for them to share space.

If you can somehow make bike paths on the roads at least four meters wide, then sure, we can talk about that. But I've never seen such a thing anywhere in my city. Anything wider than 1.5 meters is simply doesn't exist, and that is far too narrow to allow both forms of travel to share space safely.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's the real problem: we aren't prioritizing the non-car user experience.

Why do we have to make any concessions when it comes to cyclists, pedestrians, or the disabled communities? The default should be to prioritize and accommodate them first, then public transport, then cars.

We are doing things ass backwards here in Ontario.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

This I wholeheartedly agree with. The benefits of alternative transit solutions are countless, not to mention that they all reduce traffic in the first place, one of the biggest complaints of Ontarians.

And frankly, many of Toronto's mayors and councils have been pushing this and been making real progress. Unfortunately a particular premier decided that he knew better and should have the power to redesign the city and its roads, rather than the people elected specifically to do that job.