68
Want better bike lanes? Make room for wheelchairs and mobility scooters
(www.nationalobserver.com)
What's going on Canada?
🍁 Meta
🗺️ Provinces / Territories
🏙️ Cities / Local Communities
Sorted alphabetically by city name.
🏒 Sports
Hockey
Football (NFL): incomplete
Football (CFL): incomplete
Baseball
Basketball
Soccer
💻 Schools / Universities
Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.
💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales
🗣️ Politics
🍁 Social / Culture
Rules
Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca
What's the context? Country bike lane or urban trail? 30km/h on an urban bike trail is too fast. That's why places that do post speed limits for cyclists often have them at 20km/h or slower.
I disagree. If you've even been in a sufficiently wide bike track, you'll realize there are no real conflicts.
The issue is that very few tend to be very wide, so any conflict is a result of the design, and not the concept.
Yes, a single, narrow road in that scenario would create bottlenecks. Although, this is common on roads where farm equipment is used.
The more accurate comparison would be a multi-lane road where slower drivers are on the right side, while faster drivers are on the left. They have enough width over those multiple lanes to avoid conflicts.
We're asking that bike lanes be sufficiently wide to also avoid conflict.
100% agreed. Too narrow for bike trailers, cargo bikes, trikes, and mobility scooters.
That's why we need laws that make it mandatory to have WIDE lanes for these users.
We have a few places like that around here. It's unnerving to say the least, and I wish they were only going 40km/h... I've clocked cars and large trucks going well over 80km/h (in 50km or 60km/h zones) as I white-knuckle through on my bike.
Alright, I see the disconnect here. You're talking about rural bike lanes as well as park paths. I'm talking about city bike lanes where you have about 12 meters to work with before you're up against buildings on both sides half the time.
In that context, there's only so much you can do to widen lanes, and usually that's only possible by removing lanes for other modes of transit.
Frankly speaking, bike lanes of other areas have to go based on different standards as they exist for different purposes, so I've been isolating entirely to typical city streets.
Most of the sidewalks plus bike lanes in Toronto at least tend to only add up to about five meters in width at most, with plenty being only three meters wide together (two for the sidewalk, and one for the bike lane), with streets being between one or two lanes for the most part, excluding certain major streets.
In this context, it's crazy to think about bikes and wheelchairs sharing space together. And to be frank, even if the space was double that, I think the difference in typical speed makes such considerations still crazy. Just because some mobility scooters and electric wheelchairs are physically able to go as fast as a slow bike, doesn't mean that it's safe for them to share space.
If you can somehow make bike paths on the roads at least four meters wide, then sure, we can talk about that. But I've never seen such a thing anywhere in my city. Anything wider than 1.5 meters is simply doesn't exist, and that is far too narrow to allow both forms of travel to share space safely.
That's the real problem: we aren't prioritizing the non-car user experience.
Why do we have to make any concessions when it comes to cyclists, pedestrians, or the disabled communities? The default should be to prioritize and accommodate them first, then public transport, then cars.
We are doing things ass backwards here in Ontario.
This I wholeheartedly agree with. The benefits of alternative transit solutions are countless, not to mention that they all reduce traffic in the first place, one of the biggest complaints of Ontarians.
And frankly, many of Toronto's mayors and councils have been pushing this and been making real progress. Unfortunately a particular premier decided that he knew better and should have the power to redesign the city and its roads, rather than the people elected specifically to do that job.