this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2025
321 points (98.8% liked)

politics

19916 readers
3342 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Donald Trump amended his lawsuit against CBS, now alleging that a 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris unfairly diverted viewers from his Truth Social platform.

He claims CBS’ edits misled the public, boosting Harris while harming his media business, and seeks $20 billion in damages. CBS argues its edits were standard and protected by the First Amendment.

Legal experts view the case as weak, but it coincides with Paramount Global’s regulatory review, leading to reported settlement talks.

The FCC has also opened an inquiry into CBS’ editing decisions.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] meeeeetch 133 points 1 day ago (5 children)

He won the election and got exactly what he wanted and he's still mad as hell about it.

If he didn't make it everyone else's problem too, I'd feel sorry for him.

[–] AshMan85 65 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Because he probably didn't win

[–] RoidingOldMan 53 points 1 day ago (5 children)

He won due to low voter turnout and voter suppression. A win is still a win.

[–] GladiusB 3 points 1 day ago

I mean I call that cheating. But sure.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Trump on Elon Musk: "He knows those computers better than anybody. All those computers. Those vote-counting computers. And we ended up winning Pennsylvania like in a landslide."

[–] RoidingOldMan 16 points 1 day ago

That would only work if I believed anything he said.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Actually, Harris got more votes than Biden in most of the key swing states (the ones that actually matter). Trump did not win because of low turnout, quite the opposite. Even more people voted for him in those setting states than in 2020.

[–] ripcord 0 points 1 day ago

I'd still be pretty amazed if there wasn't even more nefarious voting fraud that happened.

[–] _wizard 5 points 1 day ago

Ding ding ding.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Can we not sound exactly like the deranged MAGA cult?

[–] andros_rex 8 points 1 day ago

It’s almost like falsely shouting the 2020 election was stolen was a set up to make people ignore claims the 2024 election was stolen… huh

[–] AshMan85 9 points 1 day ago

i suppose we should just bend over and take it too?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

he's a fuckin' loser. he only knows how to play the loser. even when he wins, he's a fuckin' loser.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

He won’t be satisfied until he has everything. And then even then he won’t be satisfied.

It is how purely ego-driven people operate. They are never satisfied with what they have (in terms of material wealth) and instead of looking inward (which would require humility; something the ego-driven person lacks), they project their faults on the rest of the world and think that if only they achieve more material wealth will their problems and dissatisfactions be quelled. But it never will be.

I would feel bad for how miserable such people must be if they weren’t simultaneously ruining everyone else’s lives in the process. They are destructive entities that must be stopped else they reck havoc.

[–] beansbeansbeans 1 points 1 day ago

He and his ilk are weird losers no matter how the cake is sliced.