this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2025
390 points (99.2% liked)

News

24554 readers
5080 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Elon Musk announced that he and Trump are shutting down USAID, bypassing Congress’s authority over federal spending.

Musk claimed Trump fully supports the move, though Trump has only criticized USAID without explicitly confirming its closure.

The White House has not commented. The administration has already placed USAID officials on leave and reviewed its funding.

Critics argue the move violates federal law, setting up a potential legal battle.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

That's... Not applicable here... Depending on what you mean.

That ruling was about personal responsibility and accountability. Not whether everything the government does at the president's request is legal.

i.e you can sue the government, just not the president himself.

[–] AA5B 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You also usually need “standing” to sue. If you’re personally affected, you have standing. If you’re a state or local government and have your government or citizens affected, you have standing. Who has standing here?

The human suffering cost is completely amoral and the influence cost on the us should be considered treason, but that doesn’t mean there’s someone who can sue to fix it

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago

Congress would have standing aince it's their laws being ignored - but good luck with that for 2 years.. I assume the people in USAID also have standing as their employment would be illegally terminated.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"..the President may not be prosecuted for exercising his core constitutional powers, and he is entitled to at least presump- tive immunity from prosecution for his official acts."

Source

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yes, that's what I'm saying. He can't personally be prosecuted. You can still sue the government.

[–] Jhex -1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Which translates to "Trump can do whatever he wants... if there happen to be consequences, they'll be paid by the tax payers"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I mean... You're not wrong but you've also oversimplified too much to be right.

He can't personally be punished, but then no president in history has ever actually been personally prosecuted which is why it was such a big deal that Trump may have been.

His policies and commands can still be overturned by courts though. So while he is free to command something it may or may not be done. Though chances are pretty good at the moment that he will face little in terms of opposition...

[–] Jhex 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

so where did I oversimplify exactly? he can do whatever he wants, there is a small chance he may be stopped (don't know by whom, he controls all branches of gov and the courts)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

His grants freeze was already ordered blocked by federal courts. There is some opposition, but courts are slow and trump is throwing shit like a monkey in the zoo.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

He also has pardon power, so he can direct others to break the law and then pardon them

[–] Telodzrum -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] TrickDacy -3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's cute that people are still in denial

[–] Telodzrum 1 points 2 days ago

I’d say it’s “cute” when people with no grasp of the law attempt to make broad statements about it, but it’s not. It’s actually super annoying.