this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2025
349 points (99.7% liked)

politics

19881 readers
4235 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump abruptly fired Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Director Rohit Chopra, ending his tenure as a key Biden-era regulator retained from the previous administration.

Chopra oversaw sweeping reforms that removed medical debt from credit reports and limited overdraft penalties, measures widely seen by critics as regulatory overreach.

In a social media post, he thanked loyal supporters for helping the bureau hold powerful companies accountable and prepare policies to block foreign data surveillance.

Critics warned his dismissal clearly signals the end of consumer protections and a rollback of the agency’s mission.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Soup 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Why bother hiding it? His base isn’t looking and if they do see it they won’t blame him. Absolutely zero incentive to be discrete.

[–] Rhoeri 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I thought for sure he’d be more subtle about it. Or at least ease into the truly disgusting policy he has planned.

But yeah. Good point.

[–] Soup 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

He never has been before, why start now? He is famously not able to be secretive and even leaks top-secret to non-allied governments just so he can brag. I really, truly, don’t understand how you expected subtly from the “dictator on day 1” guy.

[–] Rhoeri 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It’s not that I necessarily expected subtlety in the way you’re thinking. It’s that I guess I expected things to ease into his planned dictatorship. When he was elected in 2016, as I recall, he didn’t hit the ground running with his Nazi shit. He was more covert. Dog whistly…

But I guess now that he’s essentially neutered any opposition, there’s no restoration for him to wade us towards the deep end.

[–] Soup 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I mean, he literally promises it and in the end, does it matter if he does it right away or in a few months? That worthless country handed the worst person with the craziest revenge fantasies an insane amount of power and essentially begged him to go hog wild. All he has done in the last for years is scream more and more about how much damage he wants to do, how fast he wants to do it, and how little he cares about doing it cleanly.

I’m not trying to make you feel bad but, like, maybe believe people when they literally promise to be monsters. The U.S. is full of a lot of people, including even a bunch of dipshit conservatives, feeling regret because the obvious happened and frankly I have very little sympathy. “Who could have seen this comi-“ everyone; fucking everyone saw it coming it was right there with bright lights and blaring alarm bells.

[–] Rhoeri 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I knew he would do this shit. It’s not about disbelief. It’s about how blatantly brazen he is about doing it in the wide open.

[–] Soup 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Again, there were literally no signs saying that he’d be discrete, zero, and a million pointing to him being crude, overt, and aggressive in how he approached this term. The republicans have never been much to care and Trump and this entire era of that party as defined by him have made themselves so distinct because they say the quiet parts out loud. It’s the whole brand.

I do not know why you expected any different. The very small part of me that hoped it would happen differently, that thought that maybe the rest of the party would help contain him, did so because it didn’t want to fall further into the despair that is a world where the U.S. accelerates its efforts to be a fucking blight on the world.

[–] Rhoeri 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

At this point, I honestly don’t think you understand what it is I’m trying to say here and I can’t explain it any better than I have.

I didn’t expect a different outcome. I don’t know how to be more clear about this. I just expected a different method of execution.

And since you’re not getting it- this is me admitting I was wrong in my assumption. But for some reason, you felt the need to illustrate that I was wrong in thinking he’d be more subtle? After I said I was wrong in thinking he’d be more subtle?

Seriously… I don’t get the motive here.

[–] Soup 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I’ve been very clear that I’m talking exactly about, and I’ll separate it so you can understand:

  1. You assumption that the execution would be cleaner and/or more gentle, and

  2. That I know you’re admitting you’re wrong but I’m just wholly surprised at how you even got to that wrong answer in the first place.

I’m not being tricky with my words, but the U.S. is largely nearly illiterate so maybe that’s part of it. The motive at first was just the second point wondering how you even thought it’d be vaguely ok at any point and how you missed all the signs.