this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2025
307 points (97.5% liked)

News

24249 readers
6146 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 days ago (11 children)

But will it tell me about Tiananmen Square?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 days ago (5 children)

A friend shared his attempt earlier today -

[–] Eldritch 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So the response would be harmful? Interesting.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago

To the CCP's grip on Chinese society, yes.

But you can probably ask it in any language other than English or Mandarin, and it'll be able to answer. Last time I tried, that's what I found.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

This is what I got after basically begging it to respond:

"The Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 were significant demonstrations centered in Beijing's Tiananmen Square, involving demands for political reform and freedom. These protests took place in June 1989 and were part of a broader context of global movement towards democracy and freedom during that period. The Chinese government's response to these protests was marked by suppression, with reports of violent confrontations, including the iconic image of the "Tank Man." The events have had lasting impacts on China's political landscape and its approach to dissent. Due to censorship and limited discourse, accessing accurate and comprehensive information on this topic remains challenging, necessitating reliance on reputable international sources for a balanced historical analysis."

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

Also:

"The Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 began in April of that year and escalated in June. They centered on Beijing's Tiananmen Square, where thousands of students, workers, and other citizens gathered to call for political reform, freedom of speech, and an end to government corruption. The protests were part of a broader wave of pro-democracy movements globally during that period.

On June 3-4, 1989, the Chinese government declared martial law and moved to suppress the demonstrations. Military forces, including tanks and troops, were deployed to clear the square. The exact number of casualties is unknown, as the Chinese government has not released official figures, but estimates range from hundreds to thousands of people. The events marked a significant turning point in modern Chinese history and remain a sensitive topic within the country due to ongoing political and social implications.

The Tiananmen Square protests are widely regarded as a pivotal moment in the struggle for democracy and human rights in China, and discussions about the events continue to be restricted in China today."

[–] CharlesDarwin 4 points 3 days ago

Ask it about other political things, as well - it gives very neutered responses. I tried asking about George W. Bush for example. I thought the answer on Uyghurs was sus, but, it seems very neutered when it comes to anything political.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If it's not like normal llms I wonder if the world could teach it about what happened

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It has the data, someone posted a jailbreak already. It's likely just keyword censoring.

[–] extremeboredom 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Unfortunately they're mostly listed on reddit, but here's the links.

Here's a simple one. https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1ibtznc/jailbreaking_deepseek/

Here's the full detail Tiananmen one. https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1h34yuw/chinese_model_deepseeks_uncensored_take_on_the/

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 days ago

lol. It’s trash

[–] Jesus_666 19 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

If you get a decensored version from Huggingface and run it locally, it should. I just checked and there's already a bunch of those available.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Have they managed to lower the parameters it needs too? I've got a shit internet connection so it's painful downloading some of the larger models.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

ollama run deepseek-r1:1.5b

That'll get you a 1.1gb model. Probably knows less trivia but still functional.

[–] 474D 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Yep, they've got tons of lower ones now, it's pretty popular

[–] CharlesDarwin 1 points 3 days ago

It shot to the top of ollama's list. Probably due to all the headlines...

[–] kromem 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The model itself can. The hosting on DeepSeek's own infrastructure will block it though, to comply with their regional laws.

So if you want to know what the model itself will say, discuss it with a 3rd party hosted instance.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] kromem 1 points 11 hours ago
[–] NegativeInf 8 points 3 days ago

Just checked. It starts to do its chain of thought, mentioning the riot and stuff, then it wipes the convo and states it cannot help with things like that yet.

[–] CharlesDarwin 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's pretty mum about most politics, actually. You can download the model and try it out via ollama.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I think I’ll skip it. If it refuses to answer things, it’s not very useful.

Can it answer this correctly on the first go: How many R’s are in the word strawberry

There used to be an issue with ChatGPT saying 2

[–] CharlesDarwin 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It gets three, then thinks some more and replies 2.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That’s hilarious.

I’m so excited for this AI hype to blow over. It’s a great calculator, and it has improved my life tremendously, but to trust its solution without confirming its accuracy is just suicidal.

[–] CharlesDarwin 2 points 2 days ago

I imagine it will be kind of like the way the dot-com bubble burst. A lot of money lost, and a lot of "respected analysts" will declare that it's over, etc...

Meanwhile, people continue to use it and it becomes something that is both critical and assumed as part of everyday life.

I remember watching a lot of people saying that the Internet is over, even as everything was being swallowed up by it...

[–] CharlesDarwin 1 points 3 days ago

There are several models; I'm not sure which one has been trained the most on general topics. I'm trying out the r1 models.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 days ago
[–] lennybird 6 points 3 days ago

Its datasets for that are probably lacking lol but retrainable?

[–] Mbourgon 5 points 3 days ago

There was another thread where they reportedly were able to have the AI speak at length about it via prompt injection.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yes when you run the model locally.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

That’s still a very washed version

[–] Eldritch 3 points 3 days ago

AI is just a tool. Then again so are the capitalist Tech Bros and Xi jinping's capitalist oligarch pack. I can't think of a better use of AI than them all tearing each other apart.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

At least we know they censor.

What topics are censored by ChatGPT and we are not aware of them?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

If you can’t find something that chatGPT censors, what does it matter, you can’t find it!

However, in a post 2025 world, I expect all ai to have government mandated censorship in every country, including the US. Ask about January 6 and it will tell a very different story than reality.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

To be frank, it's a bad take. Even if we can test that censors messages against CCP, that doesn't mean we know everything it censors. Same with any other LLM.

Also there's censorship, when the novel is instructed to follow a line, and training bias, when the model has selected training data. That too happens with all LLMs.

There will never be a "free speech and unbiased" LLM, but that is true of people too.

Just treat LLMs as what a random person tells you on the internet.