this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
128 points (98.5% liked)

No Stupid Questions

36881 readers
870 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So... I found out a way to send encrypted messages using amateur radio.

There is an app called Rattlegram that lets you convert a string of text into soundwaves that plays though your phone's speaker. If I just use an app like Secure Space Encryptor (SSE) to encrypt a text, then copy-paste it to the Rattlegram app, then transmit that over radio, then using the same app to record the sound and reverse the process on the other end. Voila! Encrypted long(ish) range communications without a centralized server!

But I looked it up and apparantly its illegal to encrypt communications over the amateur radio bands. What are the odds of actually getting in trouble? ๐Ÿค”

(To the FCC agents reading this: this is just a hypothetical, a thought experiment, I'm totally not gonna do this ๐Ÿ˜‰)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

What if instead you hid an encrypted signal within an otherwise perfectly legible audio signal? Imagine a song being played. To the ear the song seems perfectly normal. But, unbeknownst to a casual listener, there is an encrypted signal embedded within the audio signal. For example, data could be embedded within a song by ever-so-slightly raising or lowering the pitch of a song multiple times per second. Then if you had a copy of the original file, software could compare the original file to the song transmitted over the radio. The locations where the pitch rose or fell could be noted, and the data could be retrieved. You could send encrypted data without anyone realizing you're sending encrypted data. To anyone else listening, it would simply sound like a song or other audio track being played.

[โ€“] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Actually, this idea has some merit, because it already has examples in other mediums. It's technically referred to as "steganography."

A common example with computers is hiding text, files, or applications within an image file.

https://github.com/7thSamurai/steganography

In the example for how to use this simple Image Steganography tool, the user hides a ZIP files with the entire contents of the book Dr. Jekyll & Mr. Hyde into the example image.

I don't see why something similar couldn't be achieved with audio.


In fact, here's an article on some basic audio steganography methods.

https://sumit-arora.medium.com/audio-steganography-the-art-of-hiding-secrets-within-earshot-part-2-of-2-c76b1be719b3

[โ€“] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Not an expert, but I'm not sure steganography would be compatible with analog lossy data transmission methods like ham radio. The examples you linked relate to digital lossless audio, where it's easy to hide the data in individual bits.

[โ€“] Deestan 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's fine, but you need to have an error correction layer.

Digital-over-analog methods like QR codes or modems are some examples.

[โ€“] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean, it's certainly possible. But given that you're trying to keep the audio as legible speech, the bandwidth would probably be horrendous.

[โ€“] Deestan 3 points 1 week ago

Yeah for sure! I'd be happy to encode a single word in a minute of audio.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Its not too hard to set up most modern trancievers for digital modes, I think the harder part would be making the mode itself.

[โ€“] evasive_chimpanzee 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There's a whole bunch of different steganographic methods. You wouldn't necessarily have to apply them to audio signals, you could apply them to the text itself. It's certainly trickier, so you would want to keep the plain text very short so your ciphertext doesn't get too long or weird

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sounds more like you're using codewords and phrases at that point? Or do you mean something different?

[โ€“] evasive_chimpanzee 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm not clever enough to come up with a good example on the spot, but you could have something along the lines of a scheme where the word selection corresponds to a not-obvious code. For example, if you wanted to secretly send the word "hello", and you've previously given your receiver a code word "apple":

Hello > 7 4 11 11 14 Apple > 0 15 15 11 4

Adding the code word to the secret message, you'd get:

7 19 0 22 18 > H T A W S

Then your message could be something like:

How are you doing? Today, I went to the store. Avocados were on sale. When do you want to meet up? Saturday looks good for me.

There are definitely way better methods to do the encoding part, and probably also better ways of doing the concealment part.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Yeah. At that point I think it's no longer considered steganography. It's really interesting though all the stuff they did during the cold war to get past surveillance.

[โ€“] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This was used in the war between Russia and Finland in 1941. Without software though.

Russian had placed bombs in a city in Finland and the bombs could be triggered by a combination of frequencies broadcast on radio.

The Finnish engineers figured it out and drove a car around the city broadcasting a song that would scramble the frequencies.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S%C3%A4kkij%C3%A4rven_polkka

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

to anyone else listening, it would simply sound like a song or other audio track being played.

I haven't seen it mentioned yet, but legally, you can't transmit music over ham radio either.