3DPrinting

15990 readers

929 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: or [email protected]

There are CAD communities available at: [email protected] or [email protected]

Rules

No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
No porn (NSFW prints are acceptable but must be marked NSFW)
No Ads / Spamming / Guerrilla Marketing
Do not create links to reddit
If you see an issue please flag it
No guns
No injury gore posts

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

On multicolor printing, why does the prime tower have to be as high as the current layer? (self.3dprinting)

submitted 3 days ago by Trail to c/3dprinting

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Recently bought an A1 mini with AMS, which has been generally great. I have been printing various things, but was thinking if the wasted filament during color changes could be further reduced.

I was wondering, if the color change happens on a high layer, why does the prime tower need to be built as high in order to flush when the color change happens? Is it not a good idea to have the prime tower not generated up until the color change is needed, and then start building it on the plate directly?

This would imply z axis movement whenever the color changes, but is it bad for some reason? It would take slightly more time, but the filament change already takes plenty of time so I assume it is not a factor of the already printed model cooling or so. Could it be something like we want to avoid unnecessary Z axis movements to avoid alignment mistakes maybe with the current layer, if the z movement is not considered precise enough?

Or it is just considered that the aavings of building a shorter tower any not that much comparatively? Anyone more knowledgeable has any thoughts?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Deckweiss 8 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I usually just disable it. Didn't see any noticable differences with or without it.

The only case where I enabled it just in case was when printing with PETG and using PLA as supports.

As to why it has to be as high: I think the printer is not so smart. Depending on the tower and object position it might crash the X axis gantry into your print if it had to go down for the prime tower. (I assume that because there are lots of unnecessary safety margins like this when printing multiple objects one by one)

[–] SzethFriendOfNimi 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

There’s also the retraction/wipe of filament. So if you can’t do it inside the print then the tower is used to give that surface to wipe off against.

Worst case then would be boogers/wisps

load more comments (1 replies)