this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2025
497 points (96.3% liked)

World News

39663 readers
3343 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy warned Europe that it cannot withstand Russia without Ukraine’s military, calling Ukraine’s victory vital to stopping Kremlin expansion.

Speaking to Polish media, Zelenskyy stressed that Russia’s larger, more brutal army would target other European nations if Ukraine falls.

He criticized Western allies for underestimating Russian President Vladimir Putin’s ambitions, urging them to strengthen Ukraine’s defenses.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] someguy3 43 points 3 days ago (5 children)

I think we should help Ukraine, but Russia would get their clock cleaned by European NATO (even without US).

[–] [email protected] 59 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Regardless, I’d rather we not test that theory. It doesn’t matter which side wins, we all would lose.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago

As long as the nuke is dropped on my head, I don't care.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

I could use a break from all this winning tho

[–] DicJacobus 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

and Europe would take catastrophic casualties in doing so.
America is an ocean away, and doesn't have to worry about war on their soil.

Europe on the other hand, can you honestly say that society is ready for events like Bucha on their soil? a Russian brigade breaks through the line, gets bogged down,isnt able to advance any further, so decides to loot , rape and mass murder the population before retreating?

Bucha and Mariupol is why the entire NATO strategy changed. it used to be that the baltics would effectively be surrendered temporarily while the European backbone mobilized, France Germany Poland etc. But thats no longer an option because intelligence knows that the Russian Soldiery, for lack of a better term, act like savage ghouls. and will put innocent men women and children to the sword for no reason other than spite.

and failing that, they will bomb a city to dust like they did to Mariupol, Bakhmut, and so many others

One thing Russia has infintely more experience than Europe, its people are used to the realities of war, Martial law, no rights, Resource scarcity, No protesting. they just behave like lemmings now. Its sad, but its an advantage.

European populations would be calling for an armistice and selling out countries on the periphery as soon as it started because they dont want to go to war.

[–] Gammelfisch 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Indeed, as long as the Russian public can absorb the causalities and ignore the piss poor conditions their soldiers are facing, the war will continue. Russia needs another 1917 to end the war and we could kick them out East Prussia, Karelia and the Northern Territories.

[–] DicJacobus 3 points 2 days ago

No one is allowed to become famous in Russia anymore, whenever someone's "brand" grows. as a figure other than the tZar. that person is very quickly dissapeared or unalived.

look at both Prigozhyn and Navalny. as examples, The objective here is clear, they are trying to prevent figureheads from acheiving the support necessary to organize a revolution. Russia has an entire "army" of militarized and secret police who's basically only got one real job, on the side they beat protesters and such, but their real job is to figuratively and literally hold a gun to the head of the army. to terrorize and intimidate the people in the military and their families, so they have no question or thought about disobeying what the boss says.

in the 90s and 2000s they were much less discrete about it, there would be cases of literal mafia goons driving into army bases, being let in, and the army base would just get robbed and people beaten up and sometimes taken, because the people in the army were scared to death of the people the goons worked for. The Mafia and The State are the same thing in Russia.

[–] someguy3 -5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Lmao you really fell for the Russian propaganda.

[–] DicJacobus 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

quite the opposite.

but I've been watching their actions for the last 10 years. And it's clear to me that most of Europe has not even been remotely taking this seriously. Militarily Russia will obviously lose, but an unthinkable amount of people will still die.

World War III is already in it's pre-game show phase. and Quisling governments are already trying to take hold of European countries before the drop of the ball/puck/etc

[–] someguy3 -3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Lolololol. Russia couldn't invade the one of the poorest countries in Europe. They couldn't do shit against any real power. And now they've wasted all their equipment and men. Ok I'm out you've fallen hard for bs.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Ok I'm out

Good riddance.

[–] seven_phone 25 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Putin has said as much, it is why he constantly reminds everyone of his nuclear arsenal and apparent willingness to end the world over small matters.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Small dick energy on Putins part.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago

Astroturfing orcs downvoting

[–] shalafi -5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Putin doesn't own a big red button he can push to launch nukes. There are layers in command that would not comply. And they've done it before. Same goes for Trump.

[–] DicJacobus 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

the Russian system is far less removed from failsafes than the US one is.

while I dont think its active anymore, the russian system was rumoured to be completely autonomous too, meaning if connection was broken between points A and B, or however the network was set up, such as Moscow or the supposed command bunkers in Mount Yamantau got taken out, some missiles would launch automatically.

as I said though, I dont think they've had the dead hand turned on for many many years. trusting a soviet computer not to malfunction is like playing russian roulette with 4 in the cylinder.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

except ukraine was the one maintaining russian missiles and we know very well how poor russian military maintenance culture is and how low the morale is to do anything if failure to do so does not result in beatings/rape. Pair that with how damn remote everything is and how even in 90s there were silos where not the high maintenance missile was in disrepair but the silo basic systems were, then the more accurate analogy would be "russian roulette with 25 round capacity cylinder, 10 rounds in and 90% are duds.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

10% of Russian nukes working fine would still be a catastrophe not worth risking.

[–] khannie 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I'm not sure how, for one second you believe that if Putin ordered a nuclear strike, that order wouldn't be carried out.

[–] DicJacobus 7 points 2 days ago

I think some people underestimate how spiteful Russians are.

their whole national identity, since the advent of Z-Fascism, has become "We dont care if we die, But we'll take you with us, you have far more to lose than us"

[–] FlashMobOfOne -1 points 2 days ago

Maybe or maybe not.

Look at Israel. Why do you think the US sending them more weapons for their genocide every month? Because they don't have the material to fight a protracted war. That's largely how it is in Europe too, and it's a good thing, because they don't have the 'bomb first and then ask questions later' mentality that Americans do.