549
Donald Trump would have been convicted over 2020 election, special counsel report says
(www.theguardian.com)
this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2025
549 points (98.2% liked)
News
23873 readers
5514 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The empires will fall but the species will remain. We would have to kill the entire planet's ecology for humanity to go extinct, we're too good at adapting.
We're working on that. The methane hydrate problem is terrifying
Sure, but I'm unconvinced that would scrub the entire surface clean. Desertification of huge swaths not near the poles, ocean pH plummeting from carbonic acid causing a mass extinction of most plankton, algae, and the life that depends on them, and the end of countless evolutionary lines. But if there's a temperate zone in Antarctica, or even a swampy tropical jungle, there's gonna be humans eating snails and xylem for however long it takes something to start sequestering carbon again.
We bounced back from a 100,000 year bottleneck with a population of 1200. We'd seal that many in an underground cave complex with naught but lichen and crickets to eat before we rolled over and died out.
Not entirely. The wars over increasingly scarce resources (such as farmable land and water) will do a lot of the extermination as well.
Sure, but consider that North Sentinel Island has been mostly isolated for tens of thousands of years. 23 square miles. That's how small of a rock we can cling to. Resource availability is the big question mark of course, and the exact nature of global ecosystem collapse and the water wars can't be known exactly, but my money is on "at least one sustainable holdout" somewhere.
Hopefully they can eventually scavenge the good bits of our mountains of waste.
That is a possible outcome. But far from a desirable one.
There is so much more we (as a species) could be doing to prevent a mass extinction event.
But instead we've got our collective heads so far up our own asses that we can't even cooperate enough to do what could be the simplest things.
It's frustrating to see this disaster coming directly at us and being prevented from taking meaningful action by politicians who refuse to cooperate, by billionaires who hoard wealth and sculpt public opion toward self-destructive ends, by religions that gleefully anticipate their scriptures version of Armageddon.
The more you study geoscience the angrier you'll get about it all, trust me.