530
68-year-old congresswoman says she's retiring to 'set a better example' amid concern over aging politicians
(www.businessinsider.com)
this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2024
530 points (99.3% liked)
politics
19267 readers
2207 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The Dems are so fucking out of touch. The GOP will take advantage of this like they do with anything and everything else.
Edit: yay. Lemmy downvote dogpiles again. Do people not understand by my wording that I am criticizing both practices? The Dems are out of touch. Stepping down is the right move, but it will be taken advantage of by the GOP.
Why can't this nuance exist without having to explain it to you like you're 5 years old?
How are elderly politicians an advantage?
They're not. But understanding nuanced wording is.
Oh yes, the nuance of the GOP will take advantage of this is so nuanced
"bOth SiDes!!" Isn't the nuanced take you seem to think it is.
Actually, that's not what I said despite what you understood.
I can vote and support the Dems, which I do for the most part, without agreeing with them. The Dems can do better. How is that "Both sides?" Or are you saying that any criticism of them can't be made? We lost this last election... do you think it's because they did a great job?
You have yet to utter even a single word explaining how you think the GOP can use this to their advantage.
By staying in office until they're piles of dusty bones, while Dems "step down to set a good example." The fallacy of "both sides" in any of this is thinking that by doing the right thing that the GOP will also follow suit.
Better?
You understand that stepping down doesn't leave that seat vacant for the 119th Congress, right? That ~~there'll be a special election to replace her~~ she's being replaced by a 38-year-old Democrat? What the fuck does this 68-year-old staying there have to offer versus someone younger?
How is someone younger automatically better?
What the fuck does my misunderstanding have to do with "both sides?" To answer your question, "No," I didn't realize that. Good - the only question will then be at reelection time when the replacement's term ends. Unless, as you noted in your cross-out, there's a special election.
"b0tH s!d3z"
Sometimes the answer is simpler than just making accusations.
I'm not the one who both-sides'd you. You'll have to take that up with the other user.