politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
It is possible to have a role in something without having control. And often it’s those who have a role but not control who can make or break an initiative.
Presidents have the power to put the brakes on legislation and to make suggestions. It’s up to congress to actually write it and refine it.
So Build Back Better not going thru...
That's a failure on Biden or no?
Same with decriminalization, student loan relief, taxing the wealthy, healthcare reform, requiring a speaking filibuster...
You agree that while Joe Biden couldn't get the votes, that because a president does have influence, a better president may have been able to?
Because that's the point. People said Biden would be able to be a good president because presidents just appoint people to do the work. And we all know now what happened with most of Biden's appointments.
So if a president can accomplish things, that means we shouldn't run another one in their 70s who just can't keep up anymore, right?
I'm not just ahitting on a sad geriatric man here, I'm making the point that Biden wasn't/isn't up to the task, and we can't afford another elderly moderate when the president does actually have power and can accomplish things.
Because "a role but no control" just sounds like getting all the honey and none of the bee stings.
Just swooping in to take credit, people generally dislike when upper management does that.
God damn, crap like this is why I hate saying I support progressives. I have to keep reminding myself that Internet progressives, Bernie or bust bros, non-pragmatic jackasses aren't who most progressives are.
So you blame Obama for being a bad president too since he couldn't get the public option in?
Do you blame progressives in the party that couldn't make the case for BBB?
You don't always get what you want 100% of the time and a decent amount of green energy that was under the BBB did get into the IRA after getting fucked by Manchin and yeah Biden was part of that progress of bringing that asshole to heel.
God, whiney ass progressives that just dismiss the good done for the lack of being perfect just pisses me off so much, stop being the enemy of progress and actually listen to what progressive leaders say and make progressive progress even if it's just an inch.
Fucks sake, was Biden the best, most progressive president? Fuck no. Could he have some a lot better? Yes. But he did a lot of good, he did advance some progressive ideas, and strengthened the unions a bit.
Yeah, and for a lot of other stuff...
I think that's the confusion and why you're so upset with progressives.
It is a lot more complicated than cheering your "team" and booing everyone else. When things get complicated, frustration is a natural reaction.
With that answer I think you're just a typical crappy Internet progressive.
Clearly you only care about your team, your ideological purity, and not making actual progress, you don't care about complexity or how shit actually works in real life and don't actually want to put any real effort in making change.
Have a good day.