this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2024
68 points (98.6% liked)

politics

19221 readers
2442 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Mining isn't a necessity. ETH lowered it's power usage by 98% by switching to Proof of Stake

[–] WoodScientist 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

Given how many people crow on about crypto's environmental impact, I would say that a whole shit ton of people care.

[–] zergtoshi 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I do.
Your claim has been falsified.

[–] WoodScientist 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sorry, I'm done giving mental cycles to crypto apologeia.

[–] zergtoshi -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well, you could try to see things as differently as they are. While I agree that PoW aka 'mining' is bad (e.g. for the environment) and there are a gazillion of scams out there, that doesn't mean that each and every crypto is bad.

[–] WoodScientist -1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I see you yearn for the sea...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Nice dude, literal death threat.

[–] WoodScientist -1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Nah. Just stating a fact of nature. Worms belong in the dirt. Pandas belong in a bamboo forest. And crypto bros...belong in the ocean!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Stating a fact about a crypto doesn't make me a crypto bro, just like making a single (somewhat abstracted, but obvious) death threat doesn't make you a murderer. Necessarily.

[–] WoodScientist -1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Ah, so you and zergtoshi are the same person. Nice job replying to your own alts! To the sea with you!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I'm sorry? Please re-read the thread. I posted the comment about ETH reducing energy consumption by 98%. That was me.

Nice low-key self report though. Everyone must have alts, right?

[–] zergtoshi 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Going from PoW to PoS and reducing the overall ecological (and economical) footprint by doing so was a great win for Ethereum and the planet.
This eludes stubborn haters and why wouldn't it, if their key characterisicts are 'stubborn' and 'hater'.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Careful, wouldn't want to be accused of having a conversation with yourself 🙄

[–] zergtoshi 2 points 2 days ago

I often have conversations with myself, just not using online platforms with different accounts.

[–] zergtoshi 1 points 2 days ago

No, we aren't.
Stop your false accusations and threats already!

[–] zergtoshi 1 points 2 days ago

These facts of nature don't extend to what you call 'crypto bros', because they're not that part of nature you insinuate they are.

[–] zergtoshi 0 points 2 days ago

Oh, I do like the sea, the waves, the beach.
What I don't like so much is people trying to force their (imho) limited perspective on others.
So please go on hating crypto unaware that you basically just hate Bitcoin (and potentially other crypto involving mining) - at least that can be derived from your recent comments - but leave me out of it.
If you can't deal with having easily falsified a statement of yours, that had no merit in the first place, you might consider refraining from making such statements.
Have fun!