this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2024
146 points (97.4% liked)
Games
32906 readers
1509 users here now
Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.
Weekly Threads:
Rules:
-
Submissions have to be related to games
-
No bigotry or harassment, be civil
-
No excessive self-promotion
-
Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts
-
Mark Spoilers and NSFW
-
No linking to piracy
More information about the community rules can be found here.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The first one wasn't even good.
I really wanted to like it, but just couldn’t get into it. It was completely forgettable for me, and I like nearly every game that has a sci-fi setting. My bar is very low for that genre, but this one was not engaging at all for me.
It was good, not great.
I wouldn't even say it was good.
It was aggressively mid.
I own it, I've played it through. I don't think I'll ever pick it up ever again. I'll get this sequel when it's under $10.
It could have been good if all the planets were actually playable.
It felt like half a game, and another six months to bake would have probably turned it into a great game with some replayability. Put a gun to my head, and I couldn't tell you the plot, but I remember both "some" fun, and a lot of frustration of how short it was.
I've played many, many good games only once and don't think I'll ever play them again.
I was more engaged by this than the Witcher 3. I'm not saying it's better, I'm just saying it was engaging.
It reviewed well, and I personally loved it.
Same here, huge fan and think proper funding will lead to a great sequel.
I liked it despite its clear flaws