politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
I've thought this before and I believe it applies here as well.
Ultra-rich LGBT people aren't really allies. Under the queer umbrella by definition, maybe, but not part of the community. It's for the best to leave their perspectives completely disregarded.
As it was during more repressive times, being super rich completely insulates them from negative influences. They don't understand what the majority of queer people have had to go through just to try to live normal lives.
For example, would anyone who's never had to worry about money care about the financial benefits of marriage that queer couples risk losing if Obergefell is overturned? Or if someone can count the number of times they've ever had to use a public restroom on one hand, would they really care about trans people who are being banned from them?
He may be gay, but at the end of the day he's still a rich, white male. There isn't going to be a leopard-eats-face moment for him, just a jaguar among leopards joining in the face-eating.
Absolutely correct, and a great example of this is Ernst Röhm, leader of the SA or "brownshirts" and one of Hitler's right hand men, who was pretty openly gay, but which was ignored and downplayed by Hitler himself. He was a Nazi first and gay second, as absurd as that sounds.
See Night of The Long Knives. The leopards came for his face.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Night_of_the_Long_Knives
And he was shot as soon as he stopped being useful.
Yep and this may partially be why I think focusing on the identities of voters and demographics has resulted in less and less support for Democrats over time.
In the end there's really two demographics that matter: rich, power hungry assholes, and the rest of us that don't collectively add up to a fraction of a percentage of their power or net worth.
A gay leopard!