this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
383 points (99.5% liked)

politics

19118 readers
4024 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The House Ethics Committee has expanded access to its report on Matt Gaetz, recently nominated for attorney general by Trump.

The report details allegations of sexual abuse and drug use, including claims Gaetz paid women for sex and had relations with a minor, which he denies.

While House Speaker Mike Johnson seeks to block public release, some Republicans demand transparency due to Gaetz’s nomination.

The Justice Department previously investigated similar allegations but declined to press charges.

Senate confirmation hearings are expected to intensify scrutiny.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 167 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I feel like "resigning from your office" shouldn't be a way to keep forever sealed the results of investigations that have already happened.

[–] JeeBaiChow 68 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well I know someone who shut down over 90(?) felony charges simply by running for election. And succeeding, apparently. Apparently heads of state and president elects are all immune to the justice system.

[–] billiam0202 18 points 2 days ago

I'm sure the people who were big mad that Hillary Clinton may have violated company policy but didn't break any laws will be equally outraged at this.

[–] danekrae 69 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

"Boss, you're not allowed to report me for stealing in the workplace, because I quit"

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You can't arrest me, I'm a sovereign citizen!

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You're not a US citizen? Deported.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Don't give them ideas. Magats are gonna murder some minorities then renounce citizenship and not have to go to prison.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Non-citizens can still go to prison, especially if there is nowhere to deport them to.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Ex-house members are supposed to still be under the jusdiction of the law. But here we are... 🤷‍♂️

[–] Nastybutler 2 points 1 day ago

This might be a silver lining to the madman's mass deportations. Sov cits might get swept up too, and can you imagine how pissed they'd be stuck in camps with brown people?

[–] logicbomb 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Taxpayer money was used to create that report. If they don't release it, then it's just a waste of taxpayer money.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Unless it is classified, should it not fall under FOIA?