this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
459 points (94.6% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26902 readers
3975 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
459
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by trespasser69 to c/lemmyshitpost
 

Also checkout my new community: [email protected]

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 54 points 4 days ago (8 children)

Eh. One thing proprietary software has going for it is clear design goals and the leadership to create a cohesive UX. Open source projects tend to be a grab bag of tools that work well for developers.

Not saying I don't love FOSS, but there's definitely stuff that proprietary software does better in a practical sense, whatever else your opinion of it.

[–] lectricleopard 31 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Foss struggles to get dev time. If everything was foss, we could coordinate easier.

[–] MMNT 21 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I am a designer with 20 years of experience. I've tried contributing to FOSS, but the developers are incredibly stubborn and work purely guided by their own assumptions. Hence the horrible UX on so much FOSS. There are more than enough design people that would love to contribute, but are met with nothing but ridicule and insults.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago

Time for yet another fork

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

That has not much do to with FOSS but with the people you are working with. Proprietary software you can't even contribute freely to begin with

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

This has been my experience as well but as a coder.

I can't count the number of contributions I've made, many of them minor. I'm talking 20-30 lines of code max.

I can count on two hands the number that have been either accepted or declined for a legitimate reason.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

Counterpoint - if everything was FOSS it would be absolute chaos with no direction, conflicting goals, incomplete projects, and limited oversight... and also lots of inter-dev-team drama and forking.

For instance...

source

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago

it would be absolute chaos with no direction, conflicting goals, incomplete projects, and limited oversight

You are describing the current scenario where everything is proprietary

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

Everybody likes forking...

[–] jaybone 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Some of these projects split from their parent branches for technical reasons... and some of them for not-so-technical reasons.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That is not a feature of proprietary software. That is a feature of an organisation. It only makes sense to make software for a profit in an organisation, so that's why there's so many of those. FOSS also has a lot of organisations, which are also pretty often used btw, but they are not required.

Not having to rely on an approval by any entity is a big thing for people fucking around with stuff. And fucking around with stuff makes one good at that stuff.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I don't disagree that it is a feature of organization, but if you're talking about creating a product that has been designed around a common philosophy and UX, that is diametrically opposed to fucking around with stuff. There's a place for that and it does improve people's skills, I also don't disagree there. All I'm saying is there exists a tendency for software produced by organizations to adhere to a UX philosophy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

Yeah, I got a bit too into my own head. I do agree with that.

[–] wreckedcarzz 15 points 4 days ago (2 children)

cohesive

gestures to MS products for the last 20 years

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

gestures to Windows' disk partitioner

How To Partition C Drive in Windows 11 Without Formatting Or ...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

Fair dues, Microsoft managed to fuck that up in spite of itself.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago

You can have OSS without the F

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

As someone who uses Gnome familly applications daily, I have to disagree with the notion that bad UX is fundamental to FOSS software. The gnome apps and shell all follow the same set of UX guidelines and feel quite cohesive as a result. I can definetly see where you get the idea of bad UX in foss though (looking at you, GIMP and Libreoffice)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

I'm not saying it's fundamental, sorry, I should have specified. You're exactly right, GNOME is driven by it's Foundation and so there is leadership in place to make sure that the software ends up as a cohesive whole. Software projects that don't, or that create one after the fact, tend to be a lot less so.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (2 children)

There's a very good reasons why people and organisations will pay for proprietary software when there is a free alternative available. I've used FOSS word processors before, for example, and they're okay, but nothing like what Microsoft Office can do. Same with video editing.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

There's a very good reasons why people and organisations will pay for proprietary software when there is a free alternative available.

Yup... risk transfer

Pay somebody else to take responsibility for pieces of your business process, then blame them when something goes wrong - that's why we have a contract.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

Also just making their employees more productive.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

There’s a very good reasons why people and organisations will pay for proprietary software when there is a free alternative available.

And there are also very good reasons why people and organisations are stopping relying on proprietary software and switching to open alternatives that won't lock them up.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 days ago

Not to mention the Customer/Service Suppport, that is at enterprise level because regular customer support is ... well you all know already.