this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024
262 points (97.1% liked)

News

23603 readers
3579 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Democrats historically do better in years with higher turnout.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Cool. Historically, convicted felons don't get elected to the presidency but here we are.

[–] FlyingSquid 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That has nothing to do with the voter turnout issue, so I'm not sure why you brought it up.

[–] reddit_sux 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

History doesn't predict future, that was his point.

[–] FlyingSquid 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

History can very much let you infer how the future will go. That's literally how we determine what might happen.

[–] reddit_sux 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well history did tell that convicted felon wouldn't become the president but that didn't come true.

So yes history can give an inkling about the future but it is just that, nothing more, not an absolute.

[–] FlyingSquid 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That does not involve statistical predictions based on previous elections. As far as I know, only one other convicted felon ran for president- Eugene V. Debs. Considering he was a socialist, his chances were slim.

I’m sure you know that the sample size of two is not really something you can base election predictions on. You can base them on voting patterns every four years. Really, every two.

If predictions based on previous history didn’t work, neither would weather reports.

The big issue here is that you seem to think making predictions based on historical statistics has to always be right or always be wrong, rather than right far more often than wrong.