this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2023
854 points (95.4% liked)

Selfhosted

40216 readers
964 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Hi all! I used to be a daily r/selfhosted lurker and a bit active user. Since the Reddit saga I thought that r/selfhosted would be one of the first and bigger community to move to Lemmy due to the IT knowledge of all of their users and the sensitivity about self host/privacy/open source, but I see that not only the community is still all there, but it's rising. :( That really makes me sad. How can we convince the mods there to move people here? Is it allowed to talk about Lemmy on Reddit or do we risk of being banned?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OrangeCorvus 92 points 1 year ago (5 children)

The change will come once people start searching for stuff on Google and they get results which link back to lemmy. For that to happen we need people asking for help/feedback and getting their answers here.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The most useful comment in this entire thread, the search results are a bit of a mess currently and that's a huge stumbling block.

I tried a simple search query with lemmy and the way results come back is not good

it's going to take a long time for that to change but just as a casual user I doubt I'd click anything past the first few reddit links.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The fact we're on the first screen of results is progress! 🎉

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It's definitely progress and seeing myself in one of the top results was nice but it's going to take a lot more work and tbh the decentralised nature of the links might also hurt because clicking on the dbzero link looks like a hackerman link if you know what I mean

[–] spez_ 1 points 1 year ago

You can't do site:website.com due to all the different instances

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm happy to help provide answers on my fields of interests but they are pretty much dead on Lemmy for now, it's a chicken and egg thing.

It doesn't help that because we don't really have good algorithms, my feed is dominated by generalist topics, memes, news and tech stuff. So even if I subscribe to smaller communities, if I don't intentionally go visit them they're never in my feed.

We need to better surface posts from smaller communities by having a weighted algorithm so that your feed is a mix of big and small communities.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This was actually mentioned in an issue on the github. I can't quite remember whether it was turned down or just inactive. I totally agree. If we're going to compete with big social medias then we also need some kind of algorithms. Opt-in/out of course.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Isn't Hot supposed to work like that? When it's not broken, of course.

I feel like some simple algorithm like the ones used in dithering may be used to mix up the feed.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My understanding was that hot was just posts with rapidly increasing upvotes, but it's still not weighed between big and small (could definitely be wrong).

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

You're probably right. I should go check out the source at some point.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Google's algorithm might actively down-rank Lemmy sites though, as the messages appear duplicated on multiple sites, which is usually a sign of SEO blog spam.

Probably needs a change on Google's side to better recognize federated websites. Not impossible that they will do this, lets see.

[–] Perhyte 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As of v0.18.2, Lemmy marks the "original URL" as the canonical URL so search engines know which page is the "real" one. Shouldn't that help?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe? I guess Google would need to actively look for that.

[–] Perhyte 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

According to their develop pages, they do look for that:

There are a handful of factors that play a role in canonicalization: [...], and rel="canonical" link annotations.

(but Google considers it a hint, so they don't have to honor it)


Also, that change was just for Lemmy. Other Fediverse sites may not do the same, which would lessen the effect. For example, from a quick look at a random federated post on kbin.social, there was no such <link rel="canonical"/> element present in the page source.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good to know. Might be worth making an issue report on kbin for that: https://codeberg.org/Kbin/kbin-core

[–] Perhyte 6 points 1 year ago

Someone already made one 3 hours ago. Though apparently it won't help by itself, since their robots.txt disallows indexing anyway (and that same issue also requests that to be adjusted).

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Hmm does Lemmy need search engine optimization? I have no idea how seo works these days :/

[–] denzuko 3 points 1 year ago

correct and also back linking on our blogs/medium posts/etc..