this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2024
626 points (99.2% liked)

News

23379 readers
2303 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 42 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

On the one hand, I know that the newspaper had done this for decades and stopped now...

On the other hand: If a big German newspaper recommended voting a specific person, this would be a huge scandal...

[–] michaelmrose 67 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

We have only 2 major parties and one has been a criminal enterprise for 56 years

  • Nixon Watergate
  • Reagan: sold drugs to buy guns for guys Congress said not to buy guns for because they were mass murderers
  • Bush Sr US: helped with above
  • Bush Jr faked evidence for a war which killed half a million people and cost 6 trillion dollars also illegally tortured
  • Trump do I even need to do this one?

At this point Trump wants to form militias to round up 25M people and drag them to concentration camps and turn the military loose on anyone who disagrees.

This includes 11M undocumented workers who almost all live law abiding lives and Americans who were born here from above who are by our constitution citizens regardless of the status of their parents.

He has publically called for violence, and end to our constitution, a new era where the dictator tells the government what the law is.

It is strange for any responsible party not to oppose essentially Hitler.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Opposing soneone is not unusual in Germany. Supporting one person or party is what does not happen here.

I'm not a fan of the orange one... Just telling about the German view on this..

[–] michaelmrose 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

With 2 parties supporting the other is the only way that you oppose the one.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The only way that you effectively oppose the other

You can always vote third party if you want to pay lip service while helping the candidate you dislike

[–] michaelmrose 1 points 3 weeks ago

Voting third party in a first past the post system with only 2 dominant parties not only throws away your vote. If your preference is Third party Harris Trump you are actually helping Trump win when you vote third party instead of the person who actually has a chance.

[–] guacupado 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Kind of a weird stance to find opposing someone fine but supporting someone bad. Not accusing anything, I just find that weird thinking.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

If the one you oppose is classified as far right and you print facts about them or quotes in your newspaper, it's still something different than endorsing a specific party or person, IMO..

We also had good and bad ads for some parties, but when it comes to only what the writers think, endorsing a specific party is just not happening like in the USA...

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The comparison doesn't work. In the US it is common practice that a newspaper gives a recommendation.

Also the US has a two party system. Compare this to Germany's multi party system. If you are undecided between to options a recommendation might help. If you are undecided whether you should vote the Greens or SPD a newspaper recommending CDU doesn't help you at all.

While it is not illegal for a newspaper to give a recommendation in Germany, it would be a scandal indeed. But the only reason for this would be that they didn't do it before. People are just complaining about changes like in this case as well

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Which drives the partisanisation of the media. Bozo is right about one thing: the trust in media is at an all time low in the US and trust is build through accurate and unbiased reporting. Endorsing politicians is biased as hell.

The newspapers repudiation of a fascist in dangerous times would hit that much harder had they not endorsed other politicians in less dangerous times.

So now it's damned if they do, damned if they don't... swallow that pill they must at some point. But it would have been an easier pill to swallow after the rule of fascism in the US had been averted.

[–] AA5B 4 points 3 weeks ago

It also would be easier to accept if they were not changing policy immediately before an election, especially one with such serious consequences

[–] AA5B 7 points 3 weeks ago

Fwiw, this was always the “op Ed” section, editorial opinion.

I do believe that most reputable news sources historically distinguished facts they reported on from their editors opinion. It’s worth the same as any other well-informed persons opinion.

Of course that also led to Fox “News” and a radically misinformed public, so it certainly went to hell

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Exactly - I find the comments in this thread very confusing. A free and impartial press is one of the cornerstones of democracy.

I now understand a lot better why there is such a distrust in journalism in the US.

[–] guacupado 1 points 3 weeks ago

I now understand a lot better why there is such a distrust in journalism in the US.

Because Americans aren't smart enough to realize the difference between a news article and an opinion article?