this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
496 points (97.3% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35686 readers
909 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The HELLDIVERS™^©®^³ 2 EULA is a god damn URL

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FuglyDuck 90 points 2 months ago (1 children)

many "normal" EULA's aren't really binding, if you get down to it.

Also. Relevant XKCD

[–] Breadhax0r 28 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Tell that to the people who just got denied the ability to sue over an Uber crash because their daughter agreed to the Uber eats eula

[–] Armok_the_bunny 25 points 2 months ago

Technically that's still on appeal, and tbh I do expect it to get overturned somewhere.

[–] zerosignal 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Or the family of the person who died at Disney and can't sue because they did a free trial of Disney+

[–] fluckx 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That was something Disney Lawyers claimed, but was never actually agreed/enforced.

So it doesn't actually hold any weight until a court actually rules on it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That was something Disney Lawyers claimed, but was never actually agreed/enforced.

Disney backed down. They still believe they have that right, and no court has ever said they didn't, but the bad publicity was too much for them in this case. They'll wait until there's a case that doesn't get that kind of publicity before they try to establish that precedent.

[–] fluckx 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They can believe all they want. Unless it's ruled and a precedent is set, the statement is false.

I hope people stop believing they have that kind of power, but decide not to do it from the goodness of their heart or bad publicity.

I should hope the actual law still has more relevance than a ToS.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Unless it’s ruled and a precedent is set, the statement is false.

They believe that the users agreed to a contract that specifies that in any dealings with Disney they've agreed to binding arbitration.

What's the "false statement" there?

[–] fluckx 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The fact the family can't sue. They absolutely can (edit: in my opinion). Disney Lawyers believe they can't ( edit: in their opinion). But wether or not they can is up to a judge in this case. And not up to Disney.

So saying they can't is false until there is actual clarity.

Edit: that is my opinion of course

[–] atrielienz 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Disney waved their right to arbitration after backlash. Uber might just do the same, or get sued by the government for the EULA itself.

https://www.thestreet.com/media/disney-waives-right-to-arbitration-wrongful-death-lawsuit