this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2024
379 points (77.1% liked)

Comic Strips

12008 readers
2371 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Blue_Morpho 36 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Can you name one superhero movie that follows the plot of the OP comic?

The closest I can think of is Thanos killing half the people in the universe and the heroes trying to stop him. You're on Thanos's side?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It's a bit stretched, but... Watchmen perhaps? Kind of? Nothing closer comes to mind.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Oh watchmen for sure but it's also about how bullshit the status quo is and how a crazy man can still fuck up the smartest plans by keeping a diary.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

None and all of them. The video has been posted before but the essence is that the overwhelming part of Marvel's films deals with the folloing scenary:

Bad guy tries to change something, often for legitimate reasons. God guys stop bad guy and everything stays the same. Even when people try to change something in a good way there is always something that goes horribly wrong.

[–] Blue_Morpho 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The hypothesis falls apart when the author ties the real world problems of poverty, injustice and ecological disasters to the superheroes negligence.

  1. The premises of the movies are that they are grounded in the real world. As such if superheroes transformed the world it would no longer be a recognizable setting for movie audiences.

  2. 2 hours of showing Iron Man digging wells in Africa isn't entertaining.

  3. The ability of an individual, even if superpowered, to change society is extremely limited. We have the example of Bill Gates having spent decades and tens of billions just to irradicate a single disease. What is Captain America going to do to control health care costs? Beat cancer cells in a petri dish?

[–] Zorque 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

2 hours of showing Iron Man digging wells in Africa isn’t entertaining.

It's basically like that recurring criticism of Batman "Why doesn't he just use his money to make the world a better place instead of putting on a costume and beating up poor people."

The answer, of course, being that he does both, but the former doesn't really make for fun storyline by itself, so it's always a side-plot or passing reference instead of being the main story beat.

[–] Makeitstop 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And then everyone making the criticism ignores that passing reference.

[–] Zorque 6 points 1 week ago

Nah, everyone making the reference has never consumed any media involving the character, and say as much repeatedly.

But they still make the criticism, because their favorite content creator made a longwinded video about it that was full of supposition and assumption (or flat out making shit up for the views).

Because if someone makes a 20 minute youtube video about it, it must be true.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)
  1. Grounded in the real world really stretches the trope when you consider there to be countless planets of hyper advanced beings and demi gods.

It's always seemed strange to me that earth never made any sort of meaningfull technological progress despite having access to a galaxy full of new tech. The only progress we see is that the ~~ elites~~ heroes equipment is getting more fancy with each movie.

Secondly why should a more technological advanced setting be unrecognizable to the viewer? Especially if the progress stretches over as many movies as the MCU contains?

  1. No one is asking for painstaking detail. James Bond defeating a guy who tries to privatize the water supply of a whole country was overall a decent movie IMO, only implying the problem for everyday people that arose from evil guys plan. It's all about the storytelling: Avengers find cool new tech that helps solve some earthly problem. Some people stand to lose a lot of money (think pharma industry becoming obsolete or similar) and plot against it. Avengers snuff out the plot, defeat evil mastermind and implement technology. Progress!

  2. Maybe there are certain problems that can't be solved by punching things? Like for example finding a way to timetravel in order to collect the infinity stones, which Toni Stark seems to be able to do while sipping his afternoon coffee. Individual impact has never been a problem in the MCU. After all we are talking about a superhero movie. And what does Captain America do while Toni Stark eradicates Cancer? Deal with the backlash (see 2.).

Also, going back to your first remark: Superheroes dealing with poverty and injustice is the whole subplot of Black Panther.

[–] 5too 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It’s always seemed strange to me that earth never made any sort of meaningfull technological progress despite having access to a galaxy full of new tech.

This actually seemed reasonable to me - if alien tech is anything like ours, we lack the parts to make the parts to make the parts to make the tech, so we can't mass produce any of it yet. And we're a bit of a backwater - what resources we do have of galactic interest (vibranium, maybe?) isn't for sale. So we make do with what scraps do find their way to earth.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sure, jumping multiple levels on the technology tree is not easy, but a real world analog would be China, which has turned from a "backwater" to one of the biggest competitors.

[–] Zorque 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

... because they have access to the materials.

I feel like you just ignored the major factor in their statement because it conflicted with your point of view.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

I am not sure why you think I skipped something.

Their point is, that we can't make super awesome tech X because it requires awesome tech Y, and we can't make Y because it requires cool tech Z.

My counterpoint to that is that yes, we may not have the technology, YET. But knowing it exists, we can acquire it a lot faster, than having to invent it ourselves. For example, China hasn't started by building world leading electric vehicles, either. They started out as a cheap manufacturer of simple items and gradually accumulated more expertise in more and more advanced fields.

In case you are talking about raw materials? Let's give Toni Stark a bit more sophisticated equipment than a stack of books to balance his particle accelerator on and I bet you he can fix that problem too.

[–] Blue_Morpho 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Some people stand to lose a lot of money (think pharma industry becoming obsolete or similar) and plot against it. Avengers snuff out the plot, defeat evil mastermind

That was the plot of Ironman. Stark wanted to end weapons development. Stain stood to loose money.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago

And nothing really changed. Yeah, Stark Industries doesn't produce weapons anymore. But as we see in Iron Man 2 others are happily trying to fill the gap.

[–] Blue_Morpho 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Secondly why should a more technological advanced setting be unrecognizable to the viewer

An Ironman cartoon addressed it a little by having Stark install his reactors everywhere for free clean energy.

But really it's because people go to a Marvel movie to see their comic books as live action, not watch another Star Trek movie.

Because that's the result of actual God level superhero intervention. Full Luxury Gay Space Communism. There's nothing for a friendly neighborhood Spiderman to do. *

[–] Zorque 1 points 1 week ago

Yeah, except most of the Star Trek movies are more akin to the Marvel movies than they are the Star Trek shows.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Makeitstop 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The bad guy in black panther had a point, but was also a fascist trying to start a race war. And in the end, the hero acknowledges the issues that the villain had raised and does make changes to address them.

[–] marcos -2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

"We should intervene in misbehaving countries" vs. "we must respect other countries sovereignty" is never such an easy decision as the cartoon puts it.

In the end of Black Panther, Wakanda becomes an imperialistic power.

[–] Zorque 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

... because they build outreach centers?

[–] marcos 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Have you seen things like that built around in your country?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Imperialism is about resource and labor extraction, unless they're using those outreach centers to destroy local markets so the people have to work on the plantations for pennies to scrape by, so Wakanda can buy bananas for cheap, I don't see how it's imperialism.

Or is Wakanda gonna go back to Plan A and use those outreach centers to influence elections/organize a coup and put in a comprador government?

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It was never clear whether he wanted a race war or how he planned to carry one out, he simply wanted to arm oppressed minorities all over the world.

But in any case, making the Bad Guy™ murder kittens doesn't change whether he's right.

See The Dark Knight Rises, where the Bad Guy™ neutralizes the police, and the people immediately band together to lynch the bankers and landlords (this is portrayed as a bad thing). Naturally, the Bad Guy™ then decides to nuke the city, for reasons.

[–] Blue_Morpho 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yes. Dark Night Rises was bad and that was one of the reasons.