this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
223 points (97.4% liked)

politics

18867 readers
4215 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. tried to arrange a meeting with Vice President Kamala Harris to secure a place in her administration or a cabinet post in exchange for an endorsement, according to multiple reports.

The Washington Post first reported that Kennedy made the overture through intermediaries, just weeks after he proposed as similar arrangement to former President Donald Trump after the Republican National Convention last month. The pair spoke about the plan, but did not reach an agreement on the matter.

Harris has not responded with an offer to meet and her campaign has expressed no interest to do so, the Post added.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FuglyDuck 129 points 1 month ago (3 children)

... and why should they talk with RFK? He's a spoiler candidate. He's literally holding them hostage to the votes he thinks he's going to pull from their campaign to get a seat at the table, and he's so freaking incompetent, he doesn't even realiz e that he's pulling votes from the republican weirdos rather than Democrats.

[–] [email protected] 93 points 1 month ago (2 children)

He’s trying this with both campaigns though. He is just a slimy, opportunistic douche.

[–] PapaStevesy 33 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yeah but is it working on any Democrats? I just don't see him pulling votes from anyone but Trump.

[–] macarthur_park 14 points 1 month ago

When Biden was still running RFK appealed to some voters as a more youthful alternative. The Kennedy name recognition also goes a really long way.

Generally the more people learn about him the less they like him, and Harris becoming the nominee pulled back a lot of the “he’s too old” voters. So RFK’s voter base draws more from Republicans than Democrats now. But it used to be more evenly split.

Additionally, there are still some Democrats (or Dem leaning independents) who like RFK’s antivax nonsense. Before Republicans elevated antivax theories to the party’s platform in 2016, that used to be something most commonly associated with the fringes of liberal communities.

[–] SkyezOpen 6 points 1 month ago

It was while biden was still the candidate. When kamala swapped in, rfk went from 15% to 7%.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

I mean... The guy knows he isn't gonna be president. Can't blame him for trying to line up a job after its all over. And he's a slimy opportunistic douche.

[–] SkyezOpen 18 points 1 month ago

Fun fact he actually lost more than half of his support when kamala became the candidate. He was potentially spoiling for biden, but now he's almost exclusively a hindrance to trump.

[–] Yawweee877h444 3 points 1 month ago

I agree 100%. However, think about what would happen in the political arena if he were given a position in exchange for endorsing kamala. We all know that many right wingers who don't like trump are RFKs primary supporters. Him supporting kamala would throw this group into a tailspin.

It ain't gonna happen, just sayin' it would be very interesting to watch. A big worry would be his supporters getting pissed and then swinging towards trump.

Still, I'd love to see it for the lulz.