this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2024
692 points (98.2% liked)

Science Memes

10940 readers
2907 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Documentary watcher here. Isn't the "photosphere" of the star defined by the visible surface? It is my understanding you could be "hundreds of millions of kilometers inside" the corona and not know it, but inside the photosphere?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yes, but red supergiants differ from the sun in that their photospheres are extremely dilute and don't have a sharp transition to the corona. I don't know the details of this particular star but take Betelgeuse as an example (it's probably not particularly large for this catrgory), it's radius is ~640 the sun's per Wikipedia, which gives a volume of ~260 million that of the sun. But it is only x15 times as massive as the sun, so on average ~20 million times less dense.

[–] xenoclast 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Meaning a little less than half of that radius is way way way less than 20 million times less dense. That's wild.

I think about that when looking at luminous gas clouds that are millions of lys across. We can only "see" it because all the photons coming from that region of space is concentrated in a tiny visible area.