this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2024
353 points (95.6% liked)

Fuck Cars

9808 readers
182 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] moistclump 80 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

Wouldn’t reflectors work and be low-to-no technology to allow Amish to keep to their tradition? I’m thinking similar material to diamond grade street signs.

[–] themeatbridge 81 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

No. I live in PA, and we have a similar law. I remember before it was passed, and seeing buggies with just the reflectors.

Close up, directly in front of lights, you can see reflectors fine, but your lights aren't always pointing at them. Maybe it's a curve or a hill, maybe they are approaching an intersection, but flashing lights can be seen from all angles.

Also, most Amish have no problem using modern technology when required. It's not like a pathological fear, it's a religious devotion to self-reliance. They use cell phones and power tools when they need to, and they hire "English" (non-Amish) to drive them in cars. Some are more insular than others, and they rarely get involved in politics, so they mostly just do whatever is required.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The Amish actually do use technology, but they can't use it unless there's no other alternative, for example word processing.

Also, they tend to use Linux.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That's a broad statement. Different sects and communities have different levels of what they consider acceptable.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

also very true.

[–] partial_accumen 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Also, they tend to use Linux.

I'm assuming only Gentoo, right? Compiling libraries you will never need is the height of decadence.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

They use Linux From Scratch and build from source. Bring it on, OSS world! Total control.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (2 children)

They already use those. This goes a lot deeper than "buggies are hard to see" and gets into governmentally preferred classes. Requiring the Amish switch from reflectors to lights is an act of both victim blaming and attempted cultural erasure

[–] rtxn 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Horse-drawn carriages are slow-moving vehicles just like construction or agricultural equipment, or stationary obstacles. They present a danger if visibility is limited by weather or the road's curvature.

Where I live, every vehicle is required to be illuminated when outside city limits, including carriages, and the horses themselves.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I hate this framing. The danger doesn't come from the slow moving buggies, it comes from cars moving too fast to stop within the driver's line of sight. Instead of a buggy, the "obstacle" could also be a pedestrian, a deer or a fallen tree. Should blinking lights be required for those, too?

[–] rtxn 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

You can hate it all you want if that makes you feel superior, but it's still true.

could also be a pedestrian, a deer or a fallen tree

High-vis equipment is required here when a person has to spend an extended period on roads outside inhabited areas (actually high-vis gear is mandatory in all motor vehicles), and are required to walk on the left side to always have oncoming traffic in sight as opposed to behind. Larger roads have mitigation structures (mounds, fences, warnings signs, speed limits, or grade separation) where wildlife is known to cause problems. Our taxes pay for road inspection and maintenance services to clear natural or manmade obstacles.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

If there are people on the roads they aren’t uninhabited.

“She was asking for it going to that neighborhood dressed like that.”

What’s the equivalent of rape culture but for cars mowing people down left and right?

[–] grue 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

What’s the equivalent of rape culture but for cars mowing people down left and right?

Reminds me of this: https://www.vox.com/2015/1/15/7551873/jaywalking-history

[–] DrunkEngineer 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

actually high-vis gear is mandatory in all motor vehicles

Wait, what? All this time I've been breaking the law by riding in cars without my high-vis vest?

[–] rtxn 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Is "deliberately misunderstanding a sentence" a new olympic sport or something? Because goddamn, I'm putting bets on you winning at least silver (not gold though, that one goes to the crayon muncher that brought up rape for some weird reason).

I'm sure this will be shocking to you yankees, but not everybody is an American. Over this side of the Atlantic we have actual traffic laws to regulate how multi-ton death machines are operated, and they require certain safety equipment to be present in all vehicles. Things like:

  • Spare tire and related tools
  • Warning triangle (put it on the road behind the vehicle if it gets immobilized)
  • High-visibility vest (mandatory to wear on motorcycles and by pedestrians on paved roads outside administrative city borders)
  • First-aid kit
  • Corrective eyewear if the mandatory medical exam indicates that it is needed
[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

Since you’re not an American, can you explain why you feel the need to comment on this when you don’t really know what you’re talking about?

The fine is from an Ohio state law that is (imho) unconstitutional in the United States. These people have been using their horse drawn buggies on these roads for centuries. The roads they go on are rural. Not interstate highways or autobahn or whatever.

It’s not economically feasible for every country road in the USA to have wildlife mounds/fences because of how vast our country is. Drivers here are required to stop for obstructions, fallen branches and wildlife and if you can’t you’re going too fast. I just don’t buy excuses about this, the Amish aren’t going down the road at 4 am in a blizzard. They’re way more visible than a deer and they have reflectors. I live around here (not Ohio, but basically Ohio), this law is inexcusable and targeting a religious group. It’s also legal to walk down these roads or ride a horse or drive your tractor at 20 kilometers per hour dragging a combine or something. It’s farmland.

The entire county this takes place in has only 50k people. Rural area.

I found that other commenters post about rape distasteful by the way. There are better ways to point out victim blaming.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

...or it's an effort to save lives...