this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2023
880 points (99.0% liked)

politics

18865 readers
4341 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MattyXarope 80 points 1 year ago (3 children)

And yet there are 0 consequences for not doing so. What is Congress going to do?

[–] bemenaker 53 points 1 year ago

In sane times there was impeachment. But we are not living in those sane times.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Congress is legally allowed to impeach any SCOTUS justice they want.

[–] Nightwingdragon 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And the chances of it actually leading to removal from SCOTUS hover around zero.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Blame Congress for that. It's their fault for never actually using their abilities.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What are the consequences if state or federal government decided not to follow a Supreme Court ruling? It's up to the Attorney General to enforce the laws of the Justice Department and that position is a presidential appointee.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Congress can also impose a mandate on the executive branch if they got out of hand. The issue is SCotUS is clearly out of hand now, yet congress is doing nothing. The whole "checks and balances" system is idealistic and clearly flawed.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

impose a mandate

the law for us poors is "do it or men with guns will put you in a box". what men with guns does congress have to force the president to do what scotus tell him to?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I was curious to see if this might play out had Biden invoked the 14th amendment to solve the recent debt-limit standoff. Had he done so, chances are it would have eventually gone to the Supreme Court to 'rule' whether they liked that or not. But had they ruled against it and the Biden Treasury Department just... kept paying our debt, what would the Supreme Court be able to do? Throw a fit?