this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
444 points (92.2% liked)

politics

19097 readers
3823 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Not the best source, but I can't post the image alone.

Here's the image to save you a click on Newsweek.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MeekerThanBeaker 144 points 3 months ago (8 children)

I mean, it's not a good look given what he's trying to become... but isn't he just dressing up as a wrestler whose story has a Soviet background?

This looks like a costume party and he and his friends are dressing up as wrestlers. It's like someone dressing up as The Iron Sheik.

There are worse things to go after him.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Republicans seem to like russians now in any case - which is so bizarre for anyone who remembers the "Better Dead than Red" tshirts etc that were all over during the last decade-ish of the cold war.

In any case, I don't think the 15 people who were happy about the Vance VP pick nor the frothing cult members who would still vote for Trump if his VP pick was Satan himself really care even if it were something more damning than a costume.

[–] Nuke_the_whales 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm from Central America and the u.s fucked us with its CIA dick and set up death squads to execute my country men even suspected of communism. They used us as proxies in a civil war backed by the Americans and Soviets on opposite sides. And after my country was wrecked and bombed, Americans rebuilt it and now own it. Like a neo colony. And the politicians who killed all my country men to keep the Reds away from this hemisphere, now bow to Russia and suck Putin dick. And after bombing my home, they dared call me a wet back and potential rapist, for trying to flee to North America. To flee to the Empire that colonized us

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I just wanted to say I'm sorry for this, I know this to be true, and many of us here are not proud of the imperial/colonial/rampantly destructive aspects of our history, which are absolutely not something I can lay at the feet of only one party.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I wonder how many of the people who shit on Republicans for being stupid look at this and don't see the obvious.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

Being stupid and loving wrestling has a sizeable overlap

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

The Iron Sheik would be an actual costume. What wrestler just wore a hammer and sickle shirt?

This seems to me that he went as "something communism" to a party and at some point posed with a bunch of people dressed up as wrestlers.

[–] GeneralEmergency 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What wrestler just wore a hammer and sickle shirt?

During the cold war, a lot.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I seriously don't know of any. Can you name one?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Hmm, no one wearing a hammer and sickle shirt, but plenty in some variation of leotard.

So best case Vance is just lame.

[–] GeneralEmergency 0 points 3 months ago

With what those around him are wearing he's probably going for the Nikita Koloff look

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 months ago

Oh yeah. I figure the specific costumes were more speculation. I was speaking that this is obviously some kind of dress up thing rather than an endorsement of Communism.

[–] NegativeInf 11 points 3 months ago (3 children)

True. Just doesn't seem like a well vetted candidate to me.

Additionally, it's just such a low effort, lazy costume if that is what he's going for.

It makes me wonder what pushed him to choose this character for his costume, surely there are better, more recognizable choices that could have been made? Unless he wants to be like late stage Soviet Russia.

[–] halcyoncmdr 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

True. Just doesn’t seem like a well vetted candidate to me.

If there's anything we've been able to determine this last decade or so... it's that vetting political candidates simply isn't something that's done anymore. The fact this shit is discovered by random people on Twitter instead of from the political parties doing actual research is ridiculous. apparently Opposition Research is just non-existent now.

[–] fluxion 1 points 3 months ago

Those random twitter folks aren't as random as you think.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Even if he kept the same character, the costume should be more than just a damn t shirt.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

It seems right in line with his beliefs. It seems that he'll bend his ideology to whatever makes him the most heinous. He's a living foil.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Maybe, but it does help highlight how weird he is.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Isn't he weird? Is he okay?

[–] Nuke_the_whales 0 points 3 months ago

Yeah he's either Ivan Koloff or Nikolai Volkoff

[–] Garbanzo -1 points 3 months ago

There are worse things to go after him.

And if someone eventually reports on it the audience is already primed to doubt that reporting thanks to stories like this. I'm not saying it's a vast right wing media conspiracy, but it's what one would look like.