Not The Onion

12420 readers

3362 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

kescusay

147

Hockey star Matt Dawson amputates finger to play at Olympics (www.bbc.com)

submitted 4 months ago by mecfs to c/nottheonion

37 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 37 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Honestly not a terrible decision. It sounds like even if he went ahead and did the surgery to try to salvage the finger it might not have given him full function of that digit. Why keep the finger if it's not even going to be usable?

[–] FuglyDuck 59 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Lacking full function doesn’t mean it’s not usable. Just not as usable.

Also, “might not”, so that prognosis was also “it might” (probably less than likely.)

[–] [email protected] 31 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'm a doctor and I can assure you that "from the knuckle up" means all that's left of him is the tip of a finger, which will be shit at hockey

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I don't know, he could ride the puck now

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

He could certainly ride my puck

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

"If taking the top of my finger was the price I had to pay, that's what I would do."

That decision also depends on which knuckle it needed to be amputated past. This quote makes me think it's just amputating from the top knuckle up, which is really just your fingernail. You still keep a lot of use out of the finger in that case.

Edit: Even if it's the second knuckle and up, you'd still have a solid amount of grasping utility with that finger.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Even if it’s the second knuckle and up, you’d still have a solid amount of grasping utility with that finger.

Looking at my hand and bending my fingers at various knuckles like an idiot, it seems to me that I can only achieve an angle of about 90 degrees at the sharpest between my metacarpals and my proximal phalanges, I don't see myself grasping a lot with that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

You're right. Not with the finger just by itself, but in support of the other fingers, I meant.

Should have been more clear with what I was envisioning lol sorry.

Edit: I guess that also depends on which finger it is. Like your ring finger lost at the second knuckle could probably still help support grasping, but idk about the pinky lol.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

Avoid looking like an AI character