this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2024
797 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19142 readers
3505 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Almost 40,000 people registered to vote in the 48 hours after President Biden announced he was suspending his reelection campaign and endorsing Vice President Harris, Vote.org said.

Vote.org said 38,500 new voters registered, representing the largest number of registrations in a 48-hour period this election cycle.

Of the new voter registrations, 83 percent were from people aged 18-34, according to the voting registration nonprofit group.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 115 points 3 months ago (4 children)

I was one of those people. It seemed incredibly stupid to me.

I thought we’d fracture, and infighting would eat up our next three months. I thought it would squander our remaining chances. I thought the same people who didn’t want Biden also didn’t want Kamala, and I didn’t know of anyone else.

I thought it would open us up to litigation, and because I don’t trust our judicial branch, I thought that would let Republicans strangle a candidate in courts. Most importantly, I thought Republicans actually had a plan and a strategy.

I was very wrong and it doesn’t bother me at all to admit it. In fact, I’m relieved.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 3 months ago

100% felt the same way as you. Now my sister and l are going to volunteer.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] WindyRebel 26 points 3 months ago

Hell yeah! Looks like someone got some ass today!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I thought the same people who didn’t want Biden also didn’t want Kamala,

I'm still one of those people. I think she is an OK candidate, but Mark Kelly is a far better one.

That being said, I don't see a "Bernie Bros" situation forming here. I don't see people voting against her if she wins the nomination.

[–] Yawweee877h444 26 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I feel like a broken record as I keep repeating this, some agree some disagree I dont care.

Mark Kelly sucks. He opposes Medicare for all. Opposing Medicare for all is NOT a moderate position. It is definitively a right of center or conservative position. This is one of my personal deal breakers.

He also opposes the green new deal, as well as supported expanding oil drilling.

If these types of issues don't bother you then that's your prerogative.

[–] NewNewAccount 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If these types of issues don't bother you then that's your prerogative.

Losing Arizona bothers me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

This, exactly. We have a history of winning the popular vote and losing the election. We can argue about how terrible the EC is later, but that fact is not going to be changed before the election. We need to win the EC.

Harris is a California Democrat. She will easily win the blue states that anyone with a "(D)" after their name would win, and she will almost certainly take the popular vote. But that isn't enough to win a presidential election.

Kelly is a unicorn. He is a Democrat that has the demonstrated ability to win in a red state. He will win any state that Harris will win, and he has a good chance at poaching enough voters to turn some otherwise red states competitive.

Harris might squeak through a win if we are very, very lucky.

Kelly will beat Trump like a rented redheaded stepmule.

[–] Ensign_Crab 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

He is a Democrat that has the demonstrated ability to win in a red state.

The other senator form the same state also won as a Democrat. That doesn't mean Harris should select her.

[–] NewNewAccount 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Are you suggesting he be the nominee for president? In 2024?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 months ago

They don't bother me because he's one person and we need absolutely every Democrat we can get to enact any change.

If losing gracefully "with ideals" and going further right in reality because Republicans control things doesn't bother you then that's your prerogative.

[–] Passerby6497 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

. I think she is an OK candidate, but Mark Kelly is a far better one.

The last thing the Dems need is to go to the right again.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That attitude is why we keep winning the popular vote, but losing elections.

That attitude is why the Republicans can run out to the starboard wingtip and stretch out over the edge.

You can't enact progressive policies when you're benched. We are able to achieve far more progressive policies when we approach them from the center than from the left.

[–] Passerby6497 5 points 3 months ago

Shifting to the right is what Democrats do every election and wonder why they lose ...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

Right there with you. Now...people are acting like this is over and it is very far from it but I'm at least cautiously optimistic. Here's to hoping Kamala makes a good VP pick and runs a good campaign. Long road ahead still but yes, I'm very much relieved it hasn't gone off the rails so far.

By god, so far I am ecstatic I was wrong. Here's to hoping I'll still be proven wrong all the way into November 5.