this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2024
269 points (97.5% liked)

News

23293 readers
3694 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] meeeeetch 27 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The Luddites had a point about the 'de-skilling' of work and the alienation of labor. And they regularly cross-dressed.

These people are just obsessed with enforcing misery.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

General Ludd is my hero:

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

The Luddites weren't wrong. Their name has been badly misused. They were skilled professionals who were concerned that they would no longer have work as a result of the industrial revolution. They were largely right in that assessment. That doesn't mean you should try to hold up societal/technological progress like they did, but their concerns were valid. They weren't just afraid of technology as they are generally portrayed.

[–] ABCDE 2 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Technology has not resulted in reductions in employment.

[–] PunnyName 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Depends on the field. Ain't no milk man or ice box delivery anymore.

[–] ABCDE 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Depends on the country, but that was not my point. Overall employment has not suffered at the hands of technology; it improved efficiency, yes, and resulted in some occupations needing fewer (or no) people, however people found work in other areas.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You seem to be missing the Luddites point, which is that the benefits of industrialization all went to oligarchs and shareholders while the displaced workers suffered economically as the value of their skills evaporated.

The problem is Capitalism, having a machine do the work should liberate people from toil rather than income.

[–] ABCDE -1 points 3 months ago

Unless efficiency increases as the population does too.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago

Those aren't skills. Driving a truck is a skill, and there's no shortage of demand for truck drivers today.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You completely missed the point.

[–] ABCDE 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

The industrialization of industry under Capitalism benefits Capitalists, not Workers.

The luddites would never have been a thing if the rewards of automation were distributed among those whose labor they devalued.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 3 points 3 months ago

Industry consolidation and outsourcing reduces the local labor demand by setting monopsony rates for workers.

This consolidation is often facilitated by legal enclosures, environmental degradation, and state subsidies/contracts for political insiders.

So you end up with working people who lose access to primitive accumulation, while big industrial owners are able to undercut skilled tradesmen with below cost merchandise in a recessionary economy.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Sure but sometimes individuals do lose their jobs so it would have been ethical to stop technological progress back in the 1800's

[–] ABCDE 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It would not have been ethical with increasing populations and no means to scale up effectively to meet their needs. Individuals, sure, but not overall; technology has replaced people in specific situations, people who then went on to get employment in other areas.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

So those workers who were made redundant got severance pay and training for the new jobs they were assigned to, right?

No? They got thrown out on their asses with no means to provide for themselves and their families?

Geeze, sounds like the Luddites were right.

[–] ABCDE 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Looking at the bigger picture.. layoffs happen all the time for many reasons. Overall, technology has not increased unemployment.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 2 points 3 months ago

layoffs happen all the time for many reasons

Layoffs are the result of primitive capital being monopolized through enclosure and the local labor force being corralled into industries that generate more goods than the deflated economy can absorb.

There's no layoffs for yeomen farmers and independent craftsman. You only experience the phenomenon when land barons control the property and dictate how many people they wish to employ.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 2 points 3 months ago

That doesn’t mean you should try to hold up societal/technological progress like they did

A lot of what they protested was industry consolidation and price fixing.