… sure seems restricted to bodily harm to elites.
this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2024
336 points (93.1% liked)
US Authoritarianism
715 readers
562 users here now
Hello, I am researching American crimes against humanity. . This space so far has been most strongly for memes, and that's fine.
There's other groups and you are welcome to add to them. USAuthoritarianism Linktree
See Also, my website. USAuthoritarianism.com be advised at time of writing it is basically just a donate link
Cool People: [email protected]
founded 6 months ago
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Ew, the america centric map projection, cut eurasia in half, why?
What would the argument be for using a Euro-centric map for displaying data about US military interventions across the world???
It doesn't cut a large populated land in half. It's also the one everybody already know where to find anything.
But anyway, how the fuck the projection isn't symmetrical for the North and South hemispheres? How does one achieve that?
Why would that matter? This data has nothing to do with population.
That's quite a subjective and eurocentric perspective.
This appears to be a Mercator projection, or something close to it. The land in the southern hemisphere is generally close to the equator so it appears smaller as part of that distortion. Also it looks a bit weird because Antarctica usually balances that out visually, but is excluded for this map.
There's a lot of different options for displaying different kinds of information. For what this map is trying to convey, it makes sense for it to be centered on the US. The distortion doesn't really matter because distance is not important. Keeping large populated is not important because the map isn't conveying any information related to population. Is this the absolute best projection available? Probably not. But the Mercator projection is still far and away the most common today (and I see this is copy written 2010, so it would be been even more ubiquitous then).
No one ever uses this nonsense