this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2024
900 points (99.3% liked)

Science Memes

11189 readers
4384 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
900
Golden (mander.xyz)
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
59 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pyre 50 points 4 months ago (4 children)

isn't there a problem with lack of replication in the scientific world though? i feel like replication experiments don't get grants easily so people are more likely to pursue one time experiments.

[–] BenPranklin 29 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah and if it were some mundane claim it would probably get away with it. But its always something outlandish like say being able to perform fully automated blood tests with a single drop of blood.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

For a hot minute, Elizabeth Holmes had a company with a multi-billion dollar valuation based on her specious claims. It doesn't seem like the risk of getting caught deterred her from committing a phenomenal fraud, or rendering false results to thousands of patients who relied on it during her initial testing. The enormous immediate profit and prestige drowned out the nagging fear of getting caught.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

Also, the people investing in her company really should have done more independent research than they did.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Just do experiments that confirm the bias of your peers and grant review boards.

[–] AgentOrangesicle 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Someone knows the Master's thesis trick.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

It counts as long as p < 0.05