this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2024
880 points (96.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

9808 readers
35 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 months ago (3 children)

you know it's funny, they made crewcab long beds in the 80s and 90s. They were just long and looked a little goofy, had normal proportions otherwise, these have been vertically stretched and widened to compensate for the absolutely bizarre form factor that they ship in. i genuinely have no idea what they're doing with the front suspension to require the hood to be that high off of the ground. A fucking hummer has more ground clearance with a lower hood.

There is almost no reason for a truck like this to exist, especially when you consider it's interior is "luxury"

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (4 children)

I live in Germany, and I spotted one of these trucks recently. It looked huge compared to every other vehicle on the road, and one of those was a delivery van. And it was too big for its parking spot. It also had a confederate flag in the back window.

[–] okamiueru 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It'd be some tasty schadenfreude to put parking fine after parking fine. Or even just straight up impound it. It would surprise me if there isn't some German law or regulation that forbids such cars, same with the Cybertruck.

Want your stupid preference that is a detriment to everyone around you? Sorry, we don't do that here.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Someone in the dorm I lived in had a Ford Ranger. Even though it's one of Ford's smaller pickups, it looked very oversized compared to everything else in the parking garage.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

...the original compact ford ranger was a great little truck!..the midsized replacement forsook its charm, though...

...i'm not even sure who makes compact trucks in australia anymore, but they're not sold stateside...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I live in Germany, ... It also had a confederate flag in the back window.

WTF, I didn't even know that was a thing outside the U.S. Do they claim "it's our heritage not hate?"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

I didn't get to talk to the owner.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

i think the confederate flag, or a very similar flag often confused for the confederate flag is often related to UK history? Still doesn't explain why it's in germany, but it makes more sense, at least.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

yeah that sounds about right, it's basically the extent of most of these things.

[–] feedum_sneedson 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

yeah pretty much. And much like jeans, they just suck.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Some of it has to do with CAFE standards using vehicle footprint to determine the target MPG. Some of it is because of better safety standards. Some of it is just because that's what a certain portion of the market wants, and the profit margins on the large vehicles are higher, so they spend more money marketing them (creating more demand).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Some of it has to do with CAFE standards using vehicle footprint to determine the target MPG.

gotta love when the funny regulations do the opposite of what you expect them to do.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, a lot of the regulations are written by the industries they're supposed to regulate.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

if you actually look into what the insurance industries do for crash safety testing it's actually kind of fucked up.

Because they basically started with full frontal impacts at n speed, that was met, so a decade later they were like "half frontal impacts are a thing now" and turns out most cars performed pretty bad on that, so they fixed that, and like a decade later again, they were fine, and then they were like "oh no, now quarter impact frontal is bad now" and then that's what they've recently fixed.

So most of car safety seems to be for pretty specific, though i suppose "more likely" impacts.