this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2024
576 points (99.0% liked)

Political Memes

4585 readers
3415 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 141 points 5 days ago (2 children)
[–] uberdroog 91 points 5 days ago (2 children)

It's about control, not about respecting life.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Don’t a handful of them want votes from people who believe the world is literally 6000 years old?

OK, that would be about control, though political control.

There is probably one Texan legislator, at least, who also believes the 6000 year thing and could pass a lie detector for “do you really believe God breathes souls into life at conception?“

Now… Could they pass a lie detector for “do you promise you would never pay for your mistress to fly out of state for an abortion?“

Can’t say no for sure… 🤥

(Cautioning overestimating malice in a way that underestimates superstition.)

[–] AeonFelis 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Now… Could they pass a lie detector for “do you promise you would never pay for your mistress to fly out of state for an abortion?“

They probably will, but when the time come they'll manage to come up with the perfect excuse why their case is special and deserves an exemption.

[–] makyo 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Control and punishment. Until it happens to them or someone they love, then it's a worthwhile exception.

[–] uberdroog 2 points 4 days ago

98% of them believe they are part of the in crowd. Not even aware all the bullshit they eat serves a purpose opposite of their interests. It's sad. I feel empathetic toward them as I do any challenged person. Suburban and rural race theory should e studied in nitch college classes.

[–] Diplomjodler3 29 points 5 days ago (1 children)

They do. This is exactly the outcome they want. It was never about saving babies.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 5 days ago (2 children)

They're not trying to kill children, they want workers, it's about keeping people preoccupied with social issues like that so they ignore the wealth hoarding and corruption going on

[–] [email protected] 22 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It's literally just about getting votes by dividing the population so that they can stay in power.

Nothing else actually matters to them as a group.

It's all about winning the popularity contest, and if you can't win because you're actually popular and people like you, the next best thing is to win by making people hate your opponent.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago

It's all of these really, killing minorities, preventing people from aborting their future workers, dividing people on social issues so they can't come together to fix the system, and doing all that while creating a voterbase that blindly supports them. Dems are pretty similar. They just piggyback off of what the right is doing and say "we won't do that!!" While still quietly letting most of it happen because they're also in it to hoard wealth and power.

[–] Zachariah 15 points 5 days ago (1 children)

They're not not trying to kill children. Which is pretty close to trying to kill children. Not exactly the same. But close enough.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

They're not not trying to kill children

I think that's the emphasis you were going for

[–] Zachariah 4 points 5 days ago

Yeah, that’s where it would go. Thank you.

I didn’t have emphasis in mind. I was just trying to make it so the two words were distinct from each other.