this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2024
619 points (97.7% liked)

Political Memes

5520 readers
1995 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FuglyDuck 13 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Just for the record the movie was definitely not the same as the book- Heinlein himself was libertarian, though I wouldn’t say it comes across in the book.

(The book setting is definitely fascist, or at the least authoritarian;)

[–] masquenox 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Heinlein himself was ~~libertarian~~ fascist.

FTFY.

[–] FuglyDuck 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Let me rephrase- heinlein identified himself as libertarian.

[–] masquenox 2 points 5 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Heinlein himself was libertarian

didn't he change his views a couple times during his life?

[–] Throw_away_migrator 2 points 5 months ago

I dunno, but his dirty old man era was wild

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Wasn't the movie being a satire of the book a conscious choice of verhoeven's?

[–] FuglyDuck 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

The movie was satire, but they bought the naming rights after establishing most of the movie script to avoid an copyright/IP infringement battle.

It was extremely similar, but it’s more accurate to say it was an entirely separate work than not.

Verhoeven meant it as a commentary on the US militarism rather than on heinlein.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

That makes sense!