this post was submitted on 18 May 2024
715 points (89.9% liked)

Just Post

407 readers
588 users here now

Just post something 💛

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (6 children)

I'm very conflicted about this. I'd reckon that the majority of us working on these AI and robotics systems do so to try to make the world a better place; so that maybe one day people won't have to slave away in warehouses all day and pee in bottles because they can't take the time to use the bathroom. Those good intentions always get corrupted by corporations and greed. So do we stop trying to push the envelope? Do we not try to make the world a better place for fear that it'll be corrupted? I really just don't know

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

Regulations are supposed to help keep corruption and greed driven bad actors from running rampant and misusing new technology.

The problem isn't innovation. It's the extremely wealthy people throwing their money into lobbying against any regulations that would limit how they're allowed to utilize new technology like AI. Can't have things like ethics getting in the way of raking in all that money.

In the US this problem is pretty extreme because we have corporations funding our politicians via things like super PACs. It supposedly doesnt influence any politicians decisions, but we all know it must. People don't throw around that much money during election time for shits and giggles. Somebody is getting something out of it somewhere.

[–] Cikos 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

is it really corpo corruption? majority of ai art 'enthusiasts' do so in the guise of 'democratizing' art but they harrass artist by scraping their work and dming them that they will be out of jobs and will die poor.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Which like, you think this is news to any artist? Everyone is already passing around the same $20, lol.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Lmao, the majority of AI Artists use the fucking programs in peace and wish assholes like you would stop yelling at us that our creative outlet isnt real art and its stealing, which it really fucking isnt.

The amount of DnD players that will shit on AI art and then go download their next character off Pinterest where they conveniently dont have to think about wether or not the person who hosted the image stole said art, is far closer to theft than AI art is

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So do we stop trying to push the envelope? Do we not try to make the world a better place for fear that it’ll be corrupted? I really just don’t know

I think we probably need to stop having massive corpos that force people to piss in bottles, seems like the correct answer to me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You're right. I have no idea how to do that, though. One could argue that the solution to that problem would also serve as the solution to the problem of people losing their jobs to automation/AI.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

yeah idk either, talking about it seems like the best way to figure it out to me though.

And yeah it would probably snowball to a more productive and healthier workforce.

[–] Cosmicomical 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

The answer is ethics, and refusing to work on topics that are contrary to ethics. can you really complain about corporations corrupting everything if you are the one enabling them by letting them corrupt you?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yes? I've got bills to pay and literally every job I can find is unethical. I'd rather seize the factors of production than try to find a nicer capitalist.

[–] braxy29 3 points 1 month ago

the difficulty here is that not everyone is able to make that choice. people who want to be ethically driven in their work also have to maintain employment to meet their needs, and may be assigned work they might personally choose not to do.

i feel fortunate to have employment in line with my ethics and values, including that i work for a non-profit. if i lose this job, i may not have the option to wait for something similar when there is rent to pay.

i think it's worth making the effort, though.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They’re working to make a profit. They couldn’t give a shit about what effect it has on the world.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I guess you know me better than I know myself. Thanks for the info.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Very often scientific breakthroughs lead to horrible unforseen outcomes (I doubt the first people to create a recipe for black powder forsaw the havoc it'd cause) - but y'all should've seen this coming.

Automation always leads to less workforce being needed pretty much without exception. Thousands of craftsmen were put out of work by industrial machines, replaced with women and children paid dirt poor wages. Automobiles ended the era of horse and buggy (not so great an ending for the horses at large). Shorthand stenographers were put out of jobs by the type-writer. Computer was a job title before it was something that fit in your pocket.

Bottom line: If you invent something that automates X - everyone who does X will begin to lose their jobs to your automation.

Either we stop developing automation solutions, or we end requiring people have occupations to live.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Either we stop developing automation solutions, or we end requiring people have occupations to live.

UBI.