Maybe we can put the state on trial. They always want to talk about how much of a pro or an amateur he is. It's a strange obsession. The only amateurs I see are "experts", cops, media. Of course I don't want them to be better. They can just fock off.
If you are loosing an argument just mention the Nazis.
I'm disappointed that he looks nothing like the guy in the hotel and it seems to be only the right that is catching on, even though the left has every reason to. Look, we have images of him both before and after his arrest. In both cases he has massive eyebrows, a highly structured face, a broad nose, and a face with a 50:50 aspect ratio.
In the hotel, no bushy eyebrows, that's the most clear thing to spot. But everything else is wrong too. These two guys look nothing alike, at all. How are people not seeing this? Both could be described as "hot." People are making a point of mentioning that. To the internet do all hot guys look identical?
Look at the guy in the hotel. Tell me he doesn't have a narrow nose. Because he does.
Neo-puritanism needs to die. I'm getting excited because I think humanity is just generally getting fed up with control. We're done with this shit.
At least none of these people should be violent. They can have their views. But law is always violent. So it has no business being an extension of anyone's sexual views. If you violently impose your sexual perspective on others you are as good as a rapist in my book.
Maybe it's a good reason to reduce public spending in general. People act like public spending is a way to even things out, but in practice as the post evidences, the more we tax and the more the government spends the more wealth has actually been concentrated.
It looks like it will be Piranha.
Are you sure it isn't because of who has influence in media in the West? Last I checked Zimbabwean blacks don't have significant influence in media in the US.
Cecil Rhodes would threaten to chop off your children's arms if you didn't work harder. Don't pretend Hitler has a monopoly on unrelatability.
He's not conservative.
That just changes who see's it. I find I get less of a showing if I post it early. Posting sooner was my instinct too when I started doing this.
Some conspiracy theories turn out to be true. Did people on the ground at the time see things? Then maybe they know what they're talking about.
Do we disregard evidence just because the conclusion it could help draw would be uncomfortable? Then we cement our biases. "There is no evidence that." "I mean no evidence that I haven't dismissed for violating the conclusion I want."