wavebeam

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] wavebeam 1 points 4 months ago

You actually almost had me there in the first half. Well done.

[–] wavebeam 1 points 5 months ago

I happen to work for a commercial touch screen and android OEM. In my position, I needed to test a 50” 4K IDS display, and since i work from home it had to be shipped to me and we don’t exactly have a “return” option. It’s now in my bedroom with an Apple TV 4K on it.

You’re right. This is likely the only way to get a “dumb” display and tbh it’s not even the “best” display tech because it’s for commercial use, designed to run for longer hours with higher reliability at the cost of the newer fancier bells and whistles. But i didn’t pay for it and it’d pretty decent. I’m not complaining. And you’re also right that no one will actually sell you one of these. You have to buy it through a distributor at volume. Getting one outside of my weird circumstances as a one-off is basically not possible at all.

[–] wavebeam 16 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This sounds like we could afford it, we just need to take that money back from the military…

[–] wavebeam 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I noped out at “blockchain-based”

[–] wavebeam 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

So in this argument, Macs are tabaco and Linux would be… vaping? I’m not exactly sure what the absolutely necessary stress relief product would be in which a certain brand and an open source alternative would make sense to be comparable to cigarettes.

Maybe more like Jansport. Is jansport grooming kids to like a specific brand of backpacks? Or Nike for specific shoe brands? Or Kellogg and Tony the Tiger? All of these things pray on social expectations and the impressionable nature of children. Just because the school is providing fucking Lucern milk doesn’t mean they’re grooming kids to have a fondness and expectation for that milk brand. I understand this isn’t’ a popular opinion on the fedi, and I’m not fond of the big tech brands shitty tactics. But you’re all unrealistic dipshits.

[–] wavebeam -4 points 5 months ago (4 children)

I’m not saying marketing to children isn’t predatory. But this is a tool they need in school. It’s not practical at all to suggest they should be building computers and compiling their own OSes for school. Selling a product for use as a tool to children isn’t grooming. It’s definitely a marketing tactic, but so is everything?

[–] wavebeam 0 points 5 months ago

The marketing wasn’t to children? It was to schools? They still do market to children (like the iPhone and messaging) but CHILD GROOMING?!? Fuck off. Trying to sell legos to children so they’ll be hooked on high-quality plastic toys is also grooming? Y’all are fucking stupid.

[–] wavebeam 31 points 5 months ago (2 children)

This is some garbage. Adoption is NOT buying and selling children. I mean, I guess that happens under the guise of adoption. But tons of kids in foster care need permanent homes and loving families, and their biological family is not an option for any number of reasons. It is a tragedy that this happens, but fuck off with this narrative that adoption is buying and selling kids. Tons of other shit in there was bogus too. Fuck this article.

[–] wavebeam 4 points 5 months ago

“Well I’m already here drinking a Mountain Dew, might as well go all-in and drop some N-bombs”

Republicans, probably

[–] wavebeam 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

How do you sleep at night?

[–] wavebeam 2 points 5 months ago

Runza is ass, whataburger isn’t much better. In-n-out is decent. Burgerville is pretty good. I like shake shack a lot

view more: ‹ prev next ›