ah yeah, I had forgot about that. He was dead wrong in 2016 ;) I think he had Clinton at like 80% chance of winning, but I believe whatever errors they made back then were mostly corrected since.
Public lands are vital for biodiversity as well as for public recreation. You typically very rarely hear a politician talking about them though, at least it's probably 30 down on the list of talking points (for democrats obviously).
Right leaning politicians typically sell off these lands and democrats do the inverse. (1) Why is the public so unaware of such programs that have a large effect on the wellbeing of everyone? (2) I mean I generally have an idea to why, as probably most everyone else does, but what could actually be done to inform people?
also if anyone would like to debate the policy on banning "bad actors", this would also be a good place to discuss. I know typically this is discussed "closed door", but I'm trying something new...
I'm ok with doing it in comments if you'd like, there might be a few exceptions but generally many minds are better at rule making than one or two.
I'll take you up on that. I was trying to keep moderation light/non-existent but it appears that bad actors have already arrived... I was hoping that would have taken a little longer for that to happen. ¯_(ツ)_/¯ . If it continues to be active, it'll definitely be too much for one person. Thanks for offering to help.
I'd like to keep any rules and changes as transparent as possible, and am a big fan of just discussing them in comments/posts so community can have input. I'm going to add one about not "whining about other mods" lol, per a comment on the other post.
seems reasonable, I'll check back tomorrow to see if there is any consensus on what it should be... trying to do some democracy here, lol
I know most people would prefer single payer / medicare for all (as would I honestly), but assuming that democrats don't go down that road in the next 4 years, what would you like healthcare in the US to look like in the short term?
fortunately demographics will eventually shift policy on the issue, but hopefully sooner rather than later. Although the progress in renewables currently I think exceeds what anyone thought was possible 20 years ago... solar is actually the most economical power now, so that'll at least curtail a never ending emissions future, which is what it use to look like.
I had linked the old community by mistake because I was tired, this i the correct name --->
I'd like to try to curtail the personal attacks and bickering with some good rules and guidelines, but I'm not sure it will go anywhere.
Old reddit like <2014 use to be a reasonable place where people all along the political spectrum could discuss policy. That's really no longer an option because most communities/moderators just don't want to deal with that, unfortunately that only makes the problem worse...
thank you... I will consider that if this doesn't go anywhere. Reddit kinda went downhill over the last decade... it use to be a reasonable place for discussion. I would have thought though that most people that migrated here from Reddit would be slightly more mature since they understand the evil of corporate greed but it seems like lately it's 50/50 on comments now whether you're going to get personally insulted for blinking wrong.
Custom built high-wing monoplane (1927)
The Spirit of St. Louis (formally the Ryan NYP, registration: N-X-211) is the custom-built, single-engine, single-seat, high-wing monoplane that was flown by Charles Lindbergh on May 20–21, 1927, on the first solo nonstop transatlantic flight from Long Island, New York, to Paris, France, for which Lindbergh won the $25,000 Orteig Prize.
EMD SD70 locomotive
The EMD SD70 is a series of diesel-electric locomotives produced by the US company Electro-Motive Diesel.
Production commenced in late 1992 and since then over 5,700 units have been produced.
While the majority of the production was ordered for use in North America, various models of the series have been used worldwide.
Thunder Crane TC20 stiffleg derrick crane
A derrick is a lifting device composed at minimum of one guyed mast, as in a gin pole, which may be articulated over a load by adjusting its guys. Most derricks have at least two components, either a guyed mast or self-supporting tower, and a boom hinged at its base to provide articulation, as in a stiffleg derrick. The most basic type of derrick is controlled by three or four lines connected to the top of the mast, which allow it to both move laterally and cant up and down. To lift a load, a separate line runs up and over the mast with a hook on its free end, as with a crane.
A stiffleg derrick, also known as a Scotch derrick, is a derrick with a boom similar to that of a guy derrick, but instead of using guy wires to secure the top of the mast, it uses two or more stiff members, called stifflegs, which are capable of resisting either tensile or compressive forces.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derrick#Stiffleg
https://www.thundercranes.com/offshore-stiff-leg-crane-rental/
Bucyrus Model 50-B Steam shovel
Twenty-five Bucyrus Model 50-B steam shovels were sent to the Panama Canal to build bridges, roads, and drains and remove the huge quantities of soil and rock cut from the canal bed. All the shovels but one were scrapped at Panama. The survivor was shipped back to California and then brought to Denver. In the early 1950s, it was transported to Rollinsville by Roy and Russell Durand, who operated it at the Lump Gulch Placer, six miles south of Nederland, Colorado, until 1978. This steam shovel is one of two (the other at the Western Minnesota Steam Thresher's Reunion in Rollag, MN) remaining operational Bucyrus Model 50-Bs, and is preserved at the Nederland Mining Museum. Roots of Motive Power in Willits, CA has also acquired a 50-B and operates it for the public once a year at their Steam Festival in early September.
Darpa Project Orion (1950-60s)
Project Orion was a study conducted in the 1950s and 1960s by the United States Air Force, DARPA, and NASA into the viability of a nuclear pulse spaceship that would be directly propelled by a series of atomic explosions behind the craft.
Non-nuclear tests were conducted with models, but the project was eventually abandoned for several reasons, including the 1963 Partial Test Ban Treaty, which banned nuclear explosions in space, and concerns over nuclear fallout.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Orion_(nuclear_propulsion)
While Project Orion never progressed beyond the conceptual and early design phases, it remains a fascinating chapter in the history of space exploration. Its audacious approach to propulsion demonstrated the creativity and ambition of scientists and engineers during the early days of the Space Age. Although the project was never realized, it contributed valuable lessons and ideas to the field of astronautics and propulsion technology.
https://www.photonicsonline.com/doc/nuclear-dreams-the-race-to-build-project-orion-0001
It's a difficult line to walk. On the one hand do you allow blatant propaganda for the sake of discussion? Or is it better to remove toxic content before it festers.
The former sounds best in theory, but in practice the later creates a better environment for discussion in my experience. /r/askhistorians was probably the best community on reddit because it was very clearly moderated for a purpose.
I don't think posts or discussions pushing narratives that are critical of the few democracies of the world, and lacking any criticism of actual dictatorships are made in good faith. Maybe the person truly believes the narrative, but there is no doubt that universally, dictatorships are much worse places to live for freedom of expression/speech.