this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
7 points (88.9% liked)

Political Discussion and Commentary

181 readers
765 users here now

A place to discuss politics and offer political commentary. Self posts are preferred, but links to current events and news are allowed. Opinion pieces are welcome on a case by case basis, and discussion of and disagreement about issues is encouraged!

The intent is for this community to be an area for open & respectful discussion on current political issues, news & events, and that means we all have a responsibility to be open, honest, and sincere. We place as much emphasis on good content as good behavior, but the latter is more important if we want to ensure this community remains healthy and vibrant.

Content Rules:

  1. Self posts preferred.
  2. Opinion pieces and editorials are allowed on a case by case basis.
  3. No spam or self promotion.
  4. Do not post grievances about other communities or their moderators.

Commentary Rules

  1. Don’t be a jerk or do anything to prevent honest discussion.
  2. Stay on topic.
  3. Don’t criticize the person, criticize the argument.
  4. Provide credible sources whenever possible.
  5. Report bad behavior, please don’t retaliate. Reciprocal bad behavior will reflect poorly on both parties.
  6. Seek rule enforcement clarification via private message, not in comment threads.
  7. Abide by Lemmy's terms of service (attacks on other users, privacy, discrimination, etc).

Please try to up/downvote based on contribution to discussion, not on whether you agree or disagree with the commenter.

Partnered Communities:

Politics

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Today 2 points 16 hours ago

Allowing parents to give permission for children to work in dangerous jobs.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 21 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 18 hours ago

They want to classify non-cishet identities as porn and ban porn, so that's fucked

[–] laverabe 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I saw someone comment that it would 'get rid of' the dept of education. Is that actually what it says or would it just weaken it?

[–] theunknownmuncher 5 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] laverabe 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Damn it does. I mean giving everyone options to choose career and tech schools in lieu of public schools could actually improve education, but everything else there seems terrible.

[–] evasive_chimpanzee 1 points 18 hours ago

There's some reading between the lines you need to do with that paragraph. When desegregation occurred, many racists put their children into private schools, especially "christian" schools, which could be whites-only. Eventually, many years after Brown vs. the BOE (e.g., in 2000 for Bob Jones university), these whites-only schools started getting backlash for their policies, and desegregated. These people want to get back to that system.

Having taxpayer funds go to private, religious schools, taking money that should go to public schools, is legal. They can't (yet) go to whites only schools, but they can absolutely prefer "children of alumni" or some other characteristic that isn't race, but a strong proxy for it.