isles

joined 1 year ago
[–] isles 11 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Maybe free markets are better if everyone started at 0. But in free (unregulated) markets, the prime incentive is to convert public goods (the Commons) into private property, at the expense and loss of society. Our regulations are to force companies to be less evil against people with fewer resources.

[–] isles 4 points 2 days ago

Firefox is the weak opposition, dragged rightward by Chrome's Overton window.

[–] isles 10 points 3 days ago

I believe in what you want to do

Like hurting minorities, not meeee

[–] isles 2 points 5 days ago

All the rest of the parts are just for show, anyway

[–] isles 2 points 5 days ago

Sadly, too many options to narrow that one down

[–] isles 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I dont have a direct answer, but can SecuROM be sandboxed in a VM?

[–] isles 3 points 1 week ago

The only issue is where does this all go?

I can only hope to people not looking to the DNC for answers and we break their duopoly with some sort of working class / labor party.

[–] isles 1 points 1 week ago

I hope it's not headed for Buenos Aires, but I'm ready to do my part.

[–] isles 1 points 1 week ago

Yep, it's what I use, though I remember having some difficulty with the initial setup, its been very reliable since.

[–] isles 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't subscribe to your death cult.

[–] isles 6 points 1 week ago

Conservatism is a mental disorder

We should've killed them all

What the fuck

[–] isles 1 points 2 weeks ago

I always walk away from green situations saying "Well, glad I could fix it!" with a wink

 

I'm newer to Linux gaming, but the consensus I've seen is that AMD is better on Linux. Will these actions change your mind? I already have Nvidia hardware, so an open source kernel module sounds like a win.

36
Question - ZFS and rsync (self.selfhosted)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by isles to c/selfhosted
 

Hey fellow Selfhosters! I need some help, I think, and searching isn't yielding what I'm hoping for.

I recently built a new NAS for my network with 4x 18TB drives in a ZFS raidz1 pool. I previously have been using an external USB 12TB harddrive attached to a different machine.

I've been attempting to use rsync to get the 12TB drive copied over to the new pool and things go great for the first 30-45 minutes. At that point, the current copy speed diminishes and 4 current files in progress sit at 100% done. Eventually, I've had to reboot the machine, because the zpool doesn't appear accessible any longer. After reboot, the pool appears fine, no faults, and I can resume rsync for a while.

EDIT: Of note, the rsync process seems to stall and I can't get it to respect SIGINT or Ctrl+C. I can SSH in separately and running zpool status hangs with no output.

While the workaround seems to be partially successful, the point of using rsync is to make it fairly hands-free and it's been a week long process to copy the 3TB that I have now. I don't think my zpool should be disappearing like that! Makes me nervous about the long-term viability. I don't think I'm ready to drop down on Unraid.

rsync is being initiated from the NAS to copy from the old server, am I better off "pushing" than "pulling"? I can't imagine it'd make much difference.

Could my drives be bad? How could I tell? They're attached to a 10 port SATA card, could that be defective? How would I tell?

Thanks for any help! I've dabbled in linux for a long time, but I'm far from proficient, so I don't really know the intricacies of dmesg et al.

view more: next ›