been fully remote since 2008. It was fun to watch everyone else learn how to do that :)
funkyb
yea that should have been linked in the post itself. was quite confused what you were talking about.
Also - that's freaking hilarious and my hats off to the mod team of that sub. This has nothing to do with you using the delete scripts.
Gaiman's narrations are fantastic. Add Neverwhere to the list above!
sorta. what is at issue here is that the actions in question are after he held the office. that isn't a trivial difference.
lemmy may have growth pains, but I don't expect reddit exit to be a crash more than a slow burn.
can't tell if that's flippant or just uninformed. Reddit data was a significant component of the development of most big name LLMs.
Oof, this plot pains me. Commas on the axis labels would have been nice, but more importantly there's an obvious daily seasonality trend across the course of a week, and I don't think the % dips shown account for that. Had the blackout not occurred, at least some of that dip would have happened naturally.
I've been doing this too, but, why do they show up in the first place if I'm not subscribed to them?
Sure, but shouldn't we also need to subscribe to communities/mags from these instances? I know i see lots from .de domains in my feed, but I am not subscribed to any of the communities/mags on the instances those posts originate from.
Brand safety as an idea isn't dangerous, and there's an entire sub-industry in the adTech space devoted to it. The bottom line is most companies don't want their ads showing up on sites or in close proximity to certain types of content (illegal, political, hate speech, etc.). Services from these companies are used to make sure when doing ads on the open web, your DSP doesn't inadvertently put your ads in places like that. One example: https://integralads.com/solutions/brand-safety-suitability/
wouldn't you have had to subscribe to one of their communities to see those posts? If that's true, your observation isn't evidence they are deferderated and you may still be seeing their users comments on other posts.
that's both unreasonable and not the right way to approach this. Your assumption is that if you knew the names of all possible processes that you could then be in a position to make better decisions. the problem is names are useless - it's trivial for software to run under different names, so believing names can help you somehow is a waste of time.