foyrkopp

Option 1: Take the plunge as a DM, announce before hand that you're new at this. Everyone who thinks they can do better is free to give it a try.

Option 2: Local Game Store.

Option 3: reddit /r/lfg. Google how to turn a search into an RSS stream, set up a search, be ready to jump into worthwhile-seeming posts quickly. Be ready to go through a few bad/mediocre groups until you find something that clicks.

You'd need to significantly increase overall education (both among voters ans legislators) on how science works to make the latter feasible.

Scientists are human. Scientists have opinions. Scientists require funding. Scientists disagree.

Simple example: The heliocentric model didn't become accepted knowledge because the "earth is the center of the universe" crowd (who *were? scientists) was convinced by scientific argument - they weren't. It did when they died.

Science holds a lot of high-likelihood facts. This is what we call the "generally accepted body of knowledge". We know that the earth is round. We can predict gravity in most circumstances. And yes, we know that anthromorphic climate change is real.

But there's also a lot of "game-changing" studies/experiments out there that are still to be debunked without ever making it into said body of accepted knowledge. This is normal, it is how science works.

Yet it also means that for virtually any hair-brained opinion that is not already strongly refuted by said body of knowledge (flat earth, for example, is refuted), you can find some not yet debunked science to support it.

Separating the wheat from the chaff here requires insight into the scientific process (and it's assorted politics and market mechanisms) most people (and voters) don't have.

And no, just telling people whether a fact is broadly accepted in the scientific community or fringe science doesn't work. We tried that with the topic of anthromorphic climate change.

Mostly work at home.

Most peasants didn't own the fields they were working to feed their own household. Instead, they leased them from the local lord, who owned most of the land.

(This seems to be the core difference between "peasants" and " freemen" - the latter owned their own land.)

I'm exchange, they were called in to work the lord's fields as well as their leased "home plot".

As far as I know, this statistic only refers to the "holidays" where the lord was not allowed to call in their land-tenants to work. They still had to work to maintain their own household as needed.

This doesn't mean that people had to work on the lord's fields all day on all non-holidays, it was just an upper limit. The exact amount was probably codified in local laws / the lease agreement.

It also doesn't mean that people had to work all the time even on holidays - just enough to get their shit done. Some days were even explicit "no work at all" holidays or half-days, were peeps where expected to show up at church instead.

And the amount of work needed generally varied wildly with the seasons - harvest season was crunch time, winter was slow season. It also varied depending on the exact location (agriculture in the Mediterranean was different than in Scotland) and on the available technology.

https://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/happiness-spigot

Best summary to this topic I've ever seen.

My father was uninvited from the yearly family reunion due to him not joining the anti-transgender circle jerk that formed there.

Ironically though I still get emails asking me to come, for the record I am my father's transgender daughter.

I might be misreading your situation, but just from this limited context, your father seems to have his priorities straight. Feel free to tell him that a random internet stranger thinks good of him.

Office buildings would like a word with you.

It's the reason so many large corporations a talking about RTO, office real estate prices are set to plummet if everyone's keeping to WFH.

Sadly, that's only tangentially related to housing (although I believe to have read something about new subsidies for landlords converting office space into appartments).

People with legitimate service dogs usually have vests on them, not just to make it clear to business owners, but because they usually don't want people petting and distracting the service dogs when they're on duty.

One of the best sets of "work clothing" I've ever seen on a dog was on a large, leashed greymuzzle sleeping peacefully next to their owner in a very busy subway car.

Wore a harness with a text along the lines of "I'm a police dog and tired after a long day. Please do me a solid and don't disturb me. Thanks."

What about blind people with service dogs?

Isn't banning them akin to banning wheelchairs?

I believe there is a certificate for professional trained service dogs like that. (If there isn't, there should.)

A conversation along the lines of "Ma'am, we don't allow dogs in here unless they're a certified service dog." "No problem, here's my permit for Chester." should be no problem.

And if Ma'am can't get Chester to behave, she'll be treated like any other unruly guest and invited to take her business (and her dog) elsewhere.

I'm fairly certain that's the same area where wild hogs no longer find enough food in the wild and are currently enthusiastically reclaiming said golf courses.

I, for one, am rooting for the four-legged pigs on this one.

The only situation here in Europe where I hear individual cars is when I'm a pedestrian on a fairly empty road or when they're obnoxiously loud.

Otherwise, I mostly hear my own car due to modern soundproofing and maybe the overall din of all the cars combined.

The former situation is actually addressed legislatively for really quiet cars (like EVs): They're required to have a minimum noise level. If they drive slow enough to be really quiet, they have to generate an artificial sound.

(Edit: I do hear motorcycles, because they tend to have a unique, loud sound.)

My players loved and hated it both, but made it through without any deaths (a few death saves, though) and even got the Lich proper.

When I started playing Shadowrun, I was confused about this as well. Why can I remote access someone's cyberarm to begin with? The damn thing should have exactly one data connection: To the user's nervous system. That's it.

Now that I work in IT, I can tell you that it's actually extremely realistic.

Most of these systems (yes, even "hardened milspec stuff") are highly complex tech that only megacorps can design. They aren't designed for security. They're designed to sell fast and with the minimum necessary design/production investment.

That wireless access you're highjacking? It's probably a maintenance access / private data siphon with a known unpatched CVE. Or an underpaid, overworked designer/dev forgot to remove the wifi module from the prototype spec and fixing that is "somewhere down the roadmap".

If you try to flash your 'ware with secure FOSS software, you have to overcome safeguards that are designed to prevent it and risk bricking your own arm / inviting an armed "patent protection" corpo squad to your door.

Truly secure custom-build 'ware does exist, made by a small community of independent tech nuts, but making it without a full factory/devteam requires a hideous amount of work and they're just plain-out inferior than the highly-funded, mass produced corpo crap that doesn't bother with ITsec.

Most professional runners just have a good decker of their own who will run interference for them (increase RAM cost) or try to trace the hack and disable the source before it completes.