For what it's worth, they actually updated the trilogy to make it suck less, by a lot.
But why would RB even listen to them? As if they care about how well the Mexico GP sells. They care about their team's performance.
Idk, this is one of those rumours where any bit of critical thinking points to it not being true. Not saying it's your fault or anything.
I have trouble believing that rumour, how would the FOM even find out before it's too late?
I was regretting reading the comments, until I saw this:
Hi, I'm one of the cyber security experts consulted early on around the social media age restriction legislation.
Concerns about any centralised database of Australian citizens and their age maintained by the government was canvassed early on and advised very heavily against very early on, as was sharing of existing government databases. These things are not in the legislation. There is no bipartisan support for the Australian ID card. There is no government honeypot of personally information in this legislation. Per the consultaiton process, the vast majority of persons over the age of 18 already have their age verified through these platforms using existing methods such as credit card verification.
The legislation explicitly states it will be up to the social media companies to enforce the age restrictions. The government, through the E-Safety Commisioner, is to monitor the system not to run the system. The legislation does NOT mandate a method for social media companies to enforce this system or allow them access to government systems. In fact... the existing acts specifically prohobit that.
This brings us to the Digital ID Act of 2024 (which comes into effect today) allows sharing of digital ID information between Federal and State governments. There are provisions to allow sharing with specific types of private organisations from December 2026 with some pretty serious restrictions. It's also an opt-in system. A lot of the statements in the news stories you clipped from here are factually wrong if you read the actual legislation.
You shouldn't confuse election pitches - whether from Labour or Liberal/National politicians - or statements by activists with a clear agenda with the actual policies that pass parliament.
Putting her on the streets would not really solve anything either. It would just exacerbate any issues and prevent long term re-integration.
Not that she's young or anything, but the punishment shouldn't change based on the person
It does have a free plan, but you did not mention price so I thought that wasn't an issue.
The idea is that she raises that legitimately. It's a good law in theory, imo: if you can pay back 75% before sentencing, you get to live.
It's time for game publishers to think about in-game video as something beyond marketing alone," said Rhys Elliott, games analyst, MIDiA Research. ''By reclaiming video engagement, publishers have the potential to unlock new revenue streams, like advertising, and drive growth.''
Oh my, thank you! I did not know that existed!
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/26986197
Wayland and audio is fixed, but only on the canary branch for the moment, this isnt lazy either, they changed the whole screenshare flow to suit linux's permission prompts
Fudge says hello!
Edit: had tort in the title, excuse my sprinkle sized brain
(Blocked users are not shown to protect their privacy)
I don't mind politics, but I do mind:
- AI generated images
- Porn
- Anime models (all the "moe" stuff)
- Something that combines above (like thirsty AI-generated anime models)
- (RSS) bots that post links but there's never any discussion in the threads
- Non-English content that I can’t read or local content that doesn't apply to me
- Games I don't play (anymore) or will never play
Is there an easier way to curate content? Browsing "new" is like whack-a-mole.
view more: next ›
Wait, you do by install size? What's the best game in the range 20-23GB, about what I have left on my SSD?