You're right lol, though technically that could be counted as agitation too, if you aren't immediate about it ๐
Viking_Hippie
Yeah, because who wouldn't want to drive a car from a company whose quality control policy is "don't" that does welding like this?
And fit things together this well
It may be quick and pretty to look at if you don't inspect it closely, but it has the price tag of a brand new Aston Martin and the build quality of an 80s Yugo.
Yes and no: you're right about Vault-Tec, but if we take the TV show as canon (which I vote we do), the guy whose likeness (or at the very least thumb likeness) vault boy is based on was a left wing guy who was horrified to find out how evil Vault-Tec was..
English is MY second language and I understood just fine. I think they're just being willfully obtuse ๐คท
A rather agitated one, though
Better:
- Revolut (though a fintech company named after a revolution lacking the charge at the end is still moronic in several ways)
- airbnb (from awful to meh)
- Spotify (same)
Worse:
- Pinterest (original fit the platform and what it is/was pretty much perfectly. Current is meh)
- eBay (both are bad IMO, but at least the original was bad in a playful and eye-catching way. The new one is just more meh
- Burberry (the stag was notable and signalled a history of old-fashioned quality that's suitably rugged. The new one is meh AND insecure about people knowing which London they're from)
- Rimova (yet another fashion brand apparently afraid of being noticed
- DF (from one of the best and most fashion-appropriate logos to an absolute eyesore and kerning nightmare that invites vandalism)
- Jaguar (From absolutely iconic and great in every way to even uglier than the new DF one. I hope whomever came up with that got both fired and beaten and I'm a pacifist.)
The rest just go from meh to slightly different meh ๐คท
One of the worst, most unreliable and badly made cars on the market
But enough about Tesla.
And the resulting fascism, of course. ๐ฎโ๐จ
Ok, I see now that you have no interest in arguing in good faith, so I'm gonna leave you to it rather than wasting any more time on your absolutist credulity. Have the day you deserve.
See? I agree. Landmines should not be used indiscriminately
That's like saying that guns shouldn't be used violently ๐
The nature of landmines is that of an indiscriminate and long lasting danger. Do you really think that, once the war is one and it's time for civilians to move back to the areas that war has displaced them from, Ukraine is going to dig them all up again?
Because if you do, I have an explosion-proof bridge to Crimea to sell you.
Glad to see we're all on the same page of not demanding that victims meekly submit to genocide in the name of some nebulous and ill-defined moral high ground.
Holy false dichotomy, Batman! Not meekly submitting โ doing the same things that you rightly deplore your enemy for doing.
This is some "Dresden, Hiroshima, and Nagasaki were all great" type nonsense.
Ukraine has already pledged to not use them in civilian areas
Oh they promised, did they? What a relief!
It's not like politicians and diplomats who know that they'll retain the support of the richest countries in the world no matter what would ever break a promise that they made in order to get something that they want!
Just like how Israel has always told the truth to American politicians!
Yes. "Indiscriminately" being the operative word.
Russians butchering civilians doesn't make it ok for Ukraine to emulate them.
See my..vest see my vest, made from real gorilla chest!