Here comes the Fourloko reboot saga.
Rentlar
The majority opinion notes that the Supreme Court should be the one that makes these technical judgements on behalf of these agencies, despite that opinion itself containing a technical mistake...
Klaus... Klaus? Klaus!!
Go to your local marina or their website and see if there are sailing classes.
I'd think that for a blanket no-homelessness policy to be even reasonably humane, each person would need a right of address, even a 50 sqft. parcel of public land in/by the town of choosing which they can call their domicile.
Same thing in BC... In the Prince George encapment case, it was ruled that unless there are enough shelter beds that are sufficiently accessible by the affected population, they are allowed to stay in the Lower Patricia encampment.
Needless to say there was fierce competition. The pity I feel for Americans is to a level I feel physically sick.
There's one way to fix this... elect a landslide blue majority in the HoR and Senate and redefine explicitly the role of every federal agency. That way Republicans in the future can't weaponize doing nothing as easily.
If there's a threshold it may convince sellers to stay under it to avoid extra levies, e.g. $500k
Oh lord, this is the worst news to come from this week.
If sleeping anywhere for someone without a permanent place to live is allowed to be made illegal, we should have rotating shifts to keep the Court majority awake in their homes so that they will have to flee to Harlan Crow's yacht.
Rustic is the closest English word I'd put to this concept, which to an extent exists in the West.
MFW American democracy is being gutted to pieces by the SCOTUS.