Lime66

joined 2 years ago
sorted by: new top controversial old
That can't be good in c/lemmyshitpost
[–] Lime66 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Woosh

Zelensky thanks America for four minutes straight in c/[email protected]
[–] Lime66 46 points 5 days ago

Trump looks ~~ed o~~ pathetic ~~next to Zelensky~~

Donald Trump named in Jeffrey Epstein flight logs released by his own attorney general in c/news
[–] Lime66 8 points 5 days ago

My greataxe is very sad about this erasure

Exe in a bottle in c/linuxmemes
[–] Lime66 79 points 6 days ago

Wine automatically running:

Triggering the "kill your lover scene" (act 2 spoilers) in c/baldurs_gate_3
[–] Lime66 3 points 6 days ago

UPDATE: I got this scene after freeing nightsong, just before the raid on moonrise towers and fight with ketheric

Triggering the "kill your lover scene" (act 2 spoilers) in c/baldurs_gate_3
[–] Lime66 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's the thing. I don't want to kill Isobel, I'm trying resist the urge and maintain a good playthrough. I might have been unclear about that, sorry

10
Triggering the "kill your lover scene" (act 2 spoilers) (self.baldurs_gate_3)
submitted 1 week ago by Lime66 to c/baldurs_gate_3
4 comments fedilink
 

Tap for spoilerI'm on a resist durge run, and I'm wondering if I could still trigger the "kill your lover" scene after how handled the quest for Isobel.

The way I progressed after entering the shadow cursed lands was:

  • fought the shadows that ambushed the harper patrol and cursed yonas
  • Made my way to last light in, had the cutscene where Jaheira suspects you're a cultist and tries to kill you.
  • after getting her trust I talked with her inside the inn, refused to drink the wine.
  • I took a long rest before talking to Isobel
  • I talked to Isobel immediately after the long rest, then beat Marcus and the winged horrors.
  • at the next long rest, I got the quest to kill Isobel from Sceleritas. I told him something like "I'll consider it"
  • I then talked to Isobel, told her about the urge, then chose not to kill her in the dialogue.
  • the quest still hasn't shown up as me having failed to kill her, even after plenty of long rests.

Can I still get the "kill your lover" scene after how I progressed, or did I lock myself out of it? I should note, I have entered moonrise towers by now, but I did take plenty of long rests before then

Did ask ♥ in c/baldurs_gate_3
[–] Lime66 2 points 1 week ago

Read this in Karlach's voice

71 percent of Trump voters oppose Medicaid cuts: Poll in c/leopardsatemyface
[–] Lime66 8 points 1 week ago

Oh no!! Anyway

Sorry you're getting what you voted for.

Trump admits Russia attacked Ukraine in c/[email protected]
[–] Lime66 11 points 1 week ago

Coward.

52
Pigeon (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 weeks ago by Lime66 to c/birding
4 comments fedilink
 

Pigeon

Are gun designs open source? in c/linuxmemes
[–] Lime66 2 points 3 weeks ago

Gnu Unix isn't/Linux

"‽" in c/memes
[–] Lime66 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

( ͡° ͜⸘ ͡°)

"And by contributions to your PBS station from viewers like you. Thank you!" in c/memes
[–] Lime66 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The office I think. That's Michael scott's face and it looks like a shot from the office

16
[SPOILER] completed main quests for act 1, what now? (self.baldurs_gate_3)
submitted 1 month ago by Lime66 to c/baldurs_gate_3
9 comments fedilink
 

Tap for spoilerI recently cleared the Selune Temple, killed all of the leaders except Minthara, who I just knocked out, have done the party and received directions from Halsin to the Moonrise Towers.

All good, right? I should just get to the mountains or the underdark and head to act 2, right? Issue is, the party is only at level 4 right now. I assume I should find some encounters, but I'm not sure what level I should get to, and if there are enough encounters left to get to that level. I currently can think of:

  • auntie Ethel's fight.
  • the goblin camp outside of the temple (this might be enough on its own
  • the encounter at the port in the putrid bog (where kagha was going to meet according to the note)

Will doing these be enough to get to a level where act 2 is accomplishable?

4
Tiamat and fire damage (self.dnd)
submitted 1 month ago by Lime66 to c/dnd
1 comments fedilink
 

So if I were to be fighting tiamat, and I true polymorphed into another tiamat, would I be able to use fire breath against her, or would we need to do melee combat only? And would our claws be able to do anything to each other or would we have a stalemate?

16
Nullifying a warlock pact (self.dnd)
submitted 2 months ago by Lime66 to c/dnd
4 comments fedilink
 

My party recently:

  • Got to level 18

  • obtained the swords of kas

  • I have 17 levels in Bard and one in druid currently, because of that I can cast wish with the right feats, which I have currently.

  • my character recently reunited with her last living family member, her sister, who is now a warlock.

  • I want to nullify the deal, since the magic can't be taken away and having your soul gone sucks, but none of us know who the patron is.

  • Could we learn who through divination spells? And if so:

  • could a wish spell nullify the pact and un sell her soul? I would assume yes since the reality bending part is so ambiguous and encompassing

32
So all of my drivers are breaking (self.linux)
submitted 4 months ago by Lime66 to c/[email protected]
12 comments fedilink
 

Today I noticed that after I first booted my computer, my motherboard's Bluetooth card wasn't detected. I need bluetooth to use my speakers because my soundcard doesn't have linux drivers(another problem for another day) so I went without sound today. But then when I restarted the computer to see if that would change anything regarding the Bluetooth, it,

a.) Didn't change anything about the Bluetooth driver, and B) now my 2.4g dongle doesn't work for me to connect my mouse(I can still use it wired though) and my wired keyboard doesn't work.

Both times I booted my noticed that systemd was shutting down udevd, which I have never noticed before. I know that udev is controls peripherals, so that is the most likely issue.

How would I go about fixing my computer?

Computer is running fedora 40 and has an MSI mpg B650 gaming edge wifi. I can send a hardware probe if necessary

24
Interesting opinions about kodak ultramax 400 film stock (lemmy.world)
submitted 7 months ago by Lime66 to c/[email protected]
2 comments fedilink
 
114
European robin (lemmy.world)
submitted 7 months ago by Lime66 to c/birding
9 comments fedilink
 
51
Great blue heron (lemmy.world)
submitted 7 months ago by Lime66 to c/birding
2 comments fedilink
 
375
“Gay Furry Hackers” Claim Credit for Hacking Heritage Foundation Over Project 2025 (theintercept.com)
submitted 7 months ago by Lime66 to c/nottheonion
19 comments fedilink
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/24720114

SiegedSec, a collective of self-proclaimed “gay furry hackers,” has claimed credit for breaching online databases of the Heritage Foundation, the conservative think tank that spearheaded the rightwing Project 2025 playbook. On Wednesday, as part of string of hacks aimed at organizations that oppose trans rights, SiegedSec released a cache of Heritage Foundation material.

In a post to Telegram announcing the hack, SiegedSec called Project 2025 “an authoritarian Christian nationalist plan to reform the United States government.” The attack was part of the group’s #OpTransRights campaign, which recently targeted rightwing media outlet Real America’s Voice, the Hillsong megachurch, and a Minnesota pastor.

In his foreword to the Project 2025 manifesto, the Heritage Foundation’s president, Kevin Roberts, rails against “the toxic normalization of transgenderism” and “the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology.” The playbook’s other contributors call on “the next conservative administration” to roll back certain policies, including allowing trans people to serve in the military.

“We’re strongly against Project 2025 and everything the Heritage Foundation stands for,” one of SiegedSec’s leaders, who goes by the handle vio, told The Intercept.

13
New ssd shows not selectable in the bios boot menu (self.linux)
submitted 8 months ago by Lime66 to c/[email protected]
14 comments fedilink
 

I was planning on installing windows to my new ssd for a dualboot, but I noticed that windows installer didn't allow me to select the disk. I learned that it just installs to the drive that is marked as M2_1 in the bios. I thought that had something to do with boot order initially, but I'm not sure about that now. If it is boot order, my second ssd doesn't even show up in the boot order menu So:

  1. Does windows install to whatever is second in boot order or whatever is marked as M2_1 in the bios, and
  2. How can I edit this to prevent windows from nuking my main linux partition and using the empty ssd, and after the install, how should I make sure both drives are available to boot into?

Motherboard is MSI MS - 7E10

23
Small ssd (self.pcmasterrace)
submitted 10 months ago by Lime66 to c/pcmasterrace
6 comments fedilink
 

I finished my first build a few months ago, put fedora workstation on it, everything's been great so far, but there are a few games I have and love which don't work, or are incredibly unstable. so I'm looking for a small, let's say 256gb SSD, to dual boot with windows for those games as well as creative work with lightroom.

My current drive has enough storage for a windows dual boot on its own, but I do not want windows to hide the linux partition or delete it completely.

So my questions are:

  • Should I get a larger SSD than 256gb?
  • what would be a good drive at that size?
view more: next ›